R Razor, on 02 January 2015 - 10:09 AM, said:
I don't see where he said to do away with customization, but he did seem to indicate that some limitations would be a good thing, and he's right in my opinion.
Sized hard points would go FAR in helping to eliminate the min/max trend that dominates this game, it would remove the whining about the Thud ERPPC build for example. There would have to be more than size restrictions and type restrictions to make it work though, otherwise you'd still have the SPL FS's and the CERML Doomcrows running around as the new meta.
Might disagree with you on a few pts here, but fully agree with you and Sarlic on sized hardpoints. For one thing, it would actually compliments quirks more, as mechs like the 9S would still get a PPC of doom, just no 3-4 of them.
End of the day, well done, it does limit SOME degree of customization, but it ends up opening up a lot more chassis as viable. The Panther/Firestarter being a great example....... barring completely broken quirks, the Panther has no place in the game, because everything it can do, the Firestarter does better.
But now, what if the firestarter could only carry small class weapons? Well, as the Ember and 9A show, they would still be able to be brutally effective, but that Panther packing a PPC would now be able to do something they cannot.