Phobic Wraith, on 03 March 2015 - 03:46 PM, said:
Wow. that's quite a small chassis. I didn't realize the battletech and MWO scales were so different. I figured apart from little differences everything was roughly similar.
Indeed.
Of course, the scales of mechs vary a lot more in BT. As mentioned there, the short story A Dagger's Death refers to the 75 ton Marauder as having maybe a quarter of a meter height over an Atlas, with that in mind its thin, lanky and long legs and arms make a strange bit more sense. Its overall armor is typically 184 which x2 is 368 in MWO's standards. So it's big, tall, and thinly armored for its size, but that's why it is so thin!
Catapults are so ungodly fat, because they're hardly 10 meters tall. (Again note MWO's Commando is 9.7 meters tall).
Now, the Rifleman kinda towers over the Shadowhawk, but the Shadowhawk is a 55 ton scout and recon mech with some decent support firepower. The Rifleman's a nasty little bugger. (Warhammer is dwarfed by the Atlas and Awesome in BT; I couldn't believe it, this is why the SRM launcher is depicted as so big on it; the viewscreen on the Warhammer is literally a head-space without much wiggle room; this is why the Warhammer's chest is so bulged out; most of that chest is the cockpit!).
Orion is fairly short. Of interest -- there's mention that the AC/10 is belt-fed internally. The viewscreen you see on original art is large enough for a head and shoulders, and has a fair bit of wiggle room in there.
A Locust and Jenner tower over the Shadowhawk. O.o; Commando and Hunchback are the same height. Locusts are creepy tall.
The largest 'Mech, BattleMech or OmniMech to exist in from the Mackie to 3055 is the Executioner. Even the Behemoth isn't really that big; it's shorter than an Atlas. But damn is that thing long and wide.