


Looking For Group Challenge
#101
Posted 11 April 2015 - 05:34 AM

#102
Posted 11 April 2015 - 05:52 AM
#103
Posted 11 April 2015 - 06:16 AM
Thats not funny !
Edited by sCOREscream, 11 April 2015 - 06:16 AM.
#104
Posted 11 April 2015 - 06:26 AM
anyways some good matches so
#105
Posted 11 April 2015 - 06:33 AM
#106
Posted 11 April 2015 - 06:43 AM
#107
Posted 11 April 2015 - 07:10 AM
#108
Posted 11 April 2015 - 07:22 AM
I tend to solo drop a lot, and these kind of experiences are largely why I do. In my humble, very unscientific subjective opinion, games are just better in the solo Q. Sure there are stomps there, too, but I would peg it at slightly less than half of my games in the solo Q end 12-3, 3-12 or worse. That's still a lot of bad games, but it's better than my experiences in the group Q.
#109
Posted 11 April 2015 - 07:35 AM
#110
Posted 11 April 2015 - 07:36 AM
#111
Posted 11 April 2015 - 07:40 AM
Of course, it's just easier if I just link it here: http://mwomercs.com/...s?t=201504group
It would just be easier/nicer had it been accessible from the challenge info page instead (well, mostly for redeeming the prize). https://mwomercs.com...type=challenges
Edited by Deathlike, 11 April 2015 - 07:42 AM.
#112
Posted 11 April 2015 - 07:44 AM
Edit: Obviously the goal of having players use the LFG tool and expose problems works in this case, but why didn't they anticipate this problem? If you have spent time in any online game that has specific party sizes for events, you would know how much of a cluster they can be.
Edited by Moomtazz, 11 April 2015 - 07:46 AM.
#113
Posted 11 April 2015 - 07:55 AM

#114
Posted 11 April 2015 - 09:29 AM
Matt Newman, on 09 April 2015 - 03:25 PM, said:
To be perfectly clear, if you play in the right size group and get the right match score (for the mode), you will earn the rewards.
Grand total Prizes (per player) for a minimum 10 matches
- 1,000,000 C-bills
- 300 GXP
- 3 days premium time
- 4 x C-bill Airstrike
- 4 x C-bill UAV
- 4 x C-bill Cool shot
- and your choice of cockpit item or 500 mc
I seem to have gotten MC versions of the consumables. I was so hoping that you guys had figured out most of us would prefer the CB to the MC versions.

#115
Posted 11 April 2015 - 10:05 AM
- Not allow people to join open groups while they are searching/in a match.
- Allow the group leader to set the group's description.
- Correctly display "deployed" when someone is spectating in a match (currently says "not ready").
- Not crash the damn client every other time you return from a match.
#116
Posted 11 April 2015 - 10:18 AM
For this challenge, you could say "looking for a group of 10" for example.
Beyond the challenge, you could use the description to set expectations such as "experienced players doing CW drops" or "goons messing around" etc.
#117
Posted 11 April 2015 - 10:22 AM
Modo44, on 11 April 2015 - 10:05 AM, said:
- Not allow people to join open groups while they are searching/in a match.
- Allow the group leader to set the group's description.
- Correctly display "deployed" when someone is spectating in a match (currently says "not ready").
- Not crash the damn client every other time you return from a match.
- Switching off LFG before launching after you have gotten the needed numbers works quite well.
- That work be good.
- Actually this is a bug. I some people see it as not ready and some deployed. So... I guess it is bugged.
- Didn't happen for me. You want to re-repair tool before going to sleep. It might take hours to redownload everything.
#118
Posted 11 April 2015 - 10:30 AM
Docta Pain, on 11 April 2015 - 04:43 AM, said:
I have a group of "11" shown as qualifying with61 match score. Problem is that it was a 12 man with an AFK crab... so I don't get my reward even though we went through a 6minute wait to get our 12...
BUG!
fyi-an "11" group doesn't exist...
BUG!
p.s. did I mention BUG!
Had this happen too, with how hard it is to get a 12 and not get focus rolled against a faction premade its disheartening.
#119
Posted 11 April 2015 - 10:32 AM
ShinVector, on 11 April 2015 - 10:22 AM, said:
No, I should not be expected to manually perform such an obvious lock
ShinVector, on 11 April 2015 - 10:22 AM, said:
Cool story.
#120
Posted 11 April 2015 - 10:52 AM

1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users