

Top 5 Worst Scaled 'mechs To Be Rescaled?
#61
Posted 26 June 2015 - 12:33 AM
Quickdraw, Needs to be less bulky, touch shorter.
Awesome, Thinner
Nova, mostly thinner, though it needs a general size reduction.
Catapult, slightly smaller, and have the 'ears' a proper size, and the casset's removed
#62
Posted 26 June 2015 - 12:40 AM
#63
Posted 26 June 2015 - 01:08 AM
As people here seams to think biased and flat like womens without 3D understandings.
But I would say
Quikdraw looks like he needs rescaling mostly.
Edited by Jaeger Gonzo, 26 June 2015 - 01:10 AM.
#64
Posted 26 June 2015 - 01:24 AM
#65
Posted 26 June 2015 - 01:26 AM
Quickdraw/Grasshopper are okay, its their character. If they get shrunk, they will become useless.
#66
Posted 26 June 2015 - 01:42 AM
Centurion
Quickdraw
Catapult
Griffin
#68
Posted 26 June 2015 - 01:52 AM
Catapult
Centurion
Nova
Quickdraw
Trebuchet
There would be others but less urgent.
#69
Posted 26 June 2015 - 02:44 AM
Quickdraw.
Catapult.
Awesome.
Grasshopper.
#70
Posted 26 June 2015 - 03:37 AM
#71
Posted 26 June 2015 - 04:34 AM
the only Mechs that look too big to me are:
1) the Catapult variants with the missile boxes (the K2 and Jester look fine)
2) the Quickdraw
however as a Light pilot I would say that all Light Mechs are too small, I considered putting an entire list of Light Mech for my top 5
3) the Commando, maybe half (probably less) the height, width and depth of an Atlas, assuming there is some relation between displacement and mass it should not weigh much more that 10 tonnes at that size, needs scaling up by about 100%
4) the Locust, again too small
5) the Jenner, again too small
Mist Lynx, Spider, Raven and Firestarter are also all too small, I am not sure about the other Clan Lights
the IS Lights seem to be fairly well scaled in relation to each other but not in relation to everything else
I would be most curious to see how tall a skinny assault would end up being compared to the stocky Atlas.
for those who say the Grasshopper is too big, I cannot comprehend that, its torso is about 1/3 narrower and is about a 1/3 less deep, its shoulder width is almost as wide but that is because the arms are a long way out from the body, all this suggests it is about perfectly sized in comparison to the Atlas
Edited by Rogue Jedi, 26 June 2015 - 05:12 AM.
#72
Posted 26 June 2015 - 04:44 AM
Cathy, on 26 June 2015 - 12:33 AM, said:
Yes! I knew I forgot one of them barndoors...
#73
Posted 26 June 2015 - 05:18 AM
2) Nova
3) Catapult
#74
Posted 26 June 2015 - 05:31 AM
2. Quickdraw
3. Centurion
4. Trebuchet
5. Grasshopper
A Catapult scaled to about the size of the Cauldron Born would be amazing, especially the Jester and K2.
#75
Posted 26 June 2015 - 05:43 AM
Quickdraw
Catapult
Awesome
Grasshopper
#voted
#76
Posted 26 June 2015 - 05:53 AM
Beyond that, the Awesome could do with something - maybe reshaping so it's not so much of a barn door.
#77
Posted 26 June 2015 - 05:56 AM
Quickdraw
Vindicator
Mad Dog
Nova
#78
Posted 26 June 2015 - 05:57 AM
Centurion
Trebuchet
wolverine
awesome
centurion?
#79
Posted 26 June 2015 - 06:04 AM
2) Quickdraw. A very nice, 80 ton mech... except it is actually only 60 tons.
3) Awesome: Too wide, bulging, ugly "cardboard box with a decal slapped on" missile boxes that ruin the sleek lines
4) Trebuchet: Too tall, flat, and easy to destroy
5) Nova: Almost as large as mechs 15 to 20 tons heavier. Way too wide, mainly
Runner up: Thunderbolts are almost as bad as Quickdraws and probably should be looked at, too. The only reason they see play is because of the great quirks, which balance out the HUGE size.
Edited by oldradagast, 26 June 2015 - 06:05 AM.
#80
Posted 26 June 2015 - 06:07 AM
RocketDog, on 26 June 2015 - 05:53 AM, said:
Beyond that, the Awesome could do with something - maybe reshaping so it's not so much of a barn door.
If they had a constant density, then the heavier 'Mechs would still remain larger than the lighter 'Mechs.
Constant volume, on the other hand...
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users