Assault 'mechs Re-Scale Vote (Part 1)
#1
Posted 03 July 2015 - 09:35 AM
Welcome to the 'Mech re-scaling project part 1!
Here's how it's gonna work!
In Part 1:
Vote for the 'Mech you wish to have re-scaled the most on each weight class poll!
Vote for Light 'Mechs re-scale here
Vote for Medium 'Mechs re-scale here
Vote for Heavy 'Mechs re-scale here
Next step in Part 2:
On July 9th, the top 3 voted 'Mechs from each weight class poll will be collected and added to a new Poll. In the new poll, you will be able to vote between the 12 'Mechs where only the top 5 voted ones will be chosen.
Last step in Part 3:
The chosen top 5 'Mechs will have a poll of their own where you will be able to vote if the 'Mech needs to be scaled Up or scaled Down!
#2
Posted 03 July 2015 - 02:49 PM
#3
Posted 03 July 2015 - 03:01 PM
#4
Posted 03 July 2015 - 03:02 PM
Here is a chart by Taragato on reddit: Remember Mechs can be too small too
Edited by Tennex, 05 July 2015 - 09:00 AM.
#5
Posted 03 July 2015 - 03:05 PM
#6
Posted 03 July 2015 - 03:11 PM
Praetor Knight, on 03 July 2015 - 03:05 PM, said:
Seems like theres a tendency to only look at overscaled mechs. Obviously because everybody wants their favorite mechs to be a little harder to hit. Hope there isn't eventually some kind of "Scale Creep"
#7
Posted 03 July 2015 - 03:13 PM
#8
Posted 03 July 2015 - 03:20 PM
Tennex, on 03 July 2015 - 03:11 PM, said:
Seems like theres a tendency to only look at overscaled mechs. Obviously because everybody wants their favorite mechs to be a little harder to hit. Hope there isn't eventually some kind of "Scale Creep"
Ture, but at the minimum, it would be nice to have the 80 tonners have their surface volume get a tad closer to each other, meaning my vote goes to Awesomes and Gargolyes at this point.
And I'd personally love to have mechs get closer to the ~12 meter height average over time, with outliers like the Atlas, Banshee and Executioner, for example, at their appropriate scale in relation to the rest of the mech lineup.
The one mech that can see an increase are Stalkers from the Assault options. For me, the Zeus is in a great place, and it's quirks really aid it's durability from there.
#9
Posted 03 July 2015 - 03:35 PM
Tennex, on 03 July 2015 - 03:11 PM, said:
Seems like theres a tendency to only look at overscaled mechs. Obviously because everybody wants their favorite mechs to be a little harder to hit. Hope there isn't eventually some kind of "Scale Creep"
I was thinking the same thing people also don't like making things worse even if they should be. hope they let us veto some picks in the second poll. perhaps we could get 5 votes and each one can be an up vote or down vote.
#10
Posted 03 July 2015 - 03:46 PM
#11
Posted 03 July 2015 - 03:57 PM
#12
Posted 03 July 2015 - 04:04 PM
I definitely think the Zeus is on the small side and the Gargoyle is a bit too big for its own good.
Edited by Tarogato, 03 July 2015 - 04:05 PM.
#13
Posted 03 July 2015 - 04:07 PM
Tennex, on 03 July 2015 - 03:11 PM, said:
Seems like theres a tendency to only look at overscaled mechs. Obviously because everybody wants their favorite mechs to be a little harder to hit. Hope there isn't eventually some kind of "Scale Creep"
I was affraid of this as well, but seems most people understand the issue properly.
The mechs that need it the most are carrying the most votes.
I voted Kit Fox, Treb, Catapult, and Awesome, and was pleasantly surprised to see the results after voting.
#14
Posted 03 July 2015 - 04:19 PM
Tarogato, on 03 July 2015 - 04:04 PM, said:
I definitely think the Zeus is on the small side and the Gargoyle is a bit too big for its own good.
Cuz from the front it is very slender and not very tall.
The stalker's mass only shows when turned. I personally think the stalker is fine, it has a good shape, but with a low engine cap, poor twist, and no arms to protect its STs I think it is a fair trade
#15
Posted 03 July 2015 - 04:19 PM
This along with increasing its size and/or decreasing the Catapult's size to better differentiate the two.
#16
Posted 03 July 2015 - 04:21 PM
Tennex, on 03 July 2015 - 03:11 PM, said:
Seems like theres a tendency to only look at overscaled mechs. Obviously because everybody wants their favorite mechs to be a little harder to hit. Hope there isn't eventually some kind of "Scale Creep"
Nah. There really aren't many mechs that are really too small, and those that are really aren't much of a problem. The Stalker is maybe a smidge small, but keep in mind it's selling feature was that it was very compact. It's designed to be small. Also, it's a fine mech but not an overpowered one.
On the other hand, there are a lot of GROSSLY oversized mechs. Centurion is roughly the size of an Atlas, the Catapult is freaking enormous, for example. The Awesome is terrible, even with it's quirks, because it's pretty much impossible to miss.
On the Clan size, the only really genuinely poorly sized mech is the Kit Fox, so that's a plus in their favour.
IMHO, it's best to focus on the mechs that are oversized and suffer as a result - the mechs that are basically unusable beyond entry level play simply because they are too damned big.
#17
Posted 03 July 2015 - 04:30 PM
Victor: thinner
Zeus: thicker
Gargoyle: tad shorter
Stalker: all around bigger (not by much though)
Battlemaster: tad thinner
Warhawk: shrink the upper torso and make less blocky like the concept art
Highlander: fine
Banshee: fine
Executioner: tad shorter, thicker joint between upper torso and lower torso
Atlas: fine
King Crab: tad thinner
Dire Wolf: less blocky upper torso like the concept art (alpha predator not whale look)
Edited by TheSilken, 03 July 2015 - 04:32 PM.
#18
Posted 03 July 2015 - 04:35 PM
Wintersdark, on 03 July 2015 - 04:21 PM, said:
On the other hand, there are a lot of GROSSLY oversized mechs. Centurion is roughly the size of an Atlas, the Catapult is freaking enormous, for example. The Awesome is terrible, even with it's quirks, because it's pretty much impossible to miss.
On the Clan size, the only really genuinely poorly sized mech is the Kit Fox, so that's a plus in their favour.
IMHO, it's best to focus on the mechs that are oversized and suffer as a result - the mechs that are basically unusable beyond entry level play simply because they are too damned big.
Thats the thing though "selling feature." Its not a problem to be small, but it is to be large. Thats why there will always be a bias towards making mechs smaller. The Zeus is literrally the same size as the hellbringer with 15 tons difference, but that isn't "much of a problem." But the griffin being 15 tons smaller than another mech is a problem.
If we are to truely desire balance or correct scaling, it has to be with the understanding that there are problems on both sides of the spectrum.
Of course I agree that the larger mechs should be first, I'm just saying it doesn't make sense from someone desiring correct scaling for a mech that is 15 tons bigger, to somehow be problem, but a mech 15 tons smaller isn't
#20
Posted 03 July 2015 - 04:45 PM
GrimReality, on 03 July 2015 - 04:19 PM, said:
6 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 6 guests, 0 anonymous users