Breaking News: Mad-Bh2 Bounty Hunter Engine Cap Officially Raised To 300
#141
Posted 14 September 2015 - 04:03 PM
#142
Posted 14 September 2015 - 04:05 PM
Agent 0 Fortune, on 14 September 2015 - 02:18 PM, said:
The 275 engine cap seems like a good limit on the bounty hunter. Its hardpoints and jumpjets already make it a contender, anything more would outclass all of its contemporaries: Orion, Black Knight, Cataphract, Grasshopper.
zagibu, on 14 September 2015 - 03:04 PM, said:
ding ding ding ding ding. Winner for getting the point.
1) Hardpoints are overrated. Slow laser vomit is not that impressive. When Mr Gargles does it better than you, and 25 kph faster?
2) Low engine means limited room for DHS
3) Low engine means slow twist.
4) JJs are highly overrated on heavy mechs, unless buffed, like Summoner
5) Hardpoints overrated, because aside from a single ballistic, they are all low.
Edited by Bishop Steiner, 14 September 2015 - 04:08 PM.
#143
Posted 14 September 2015 - 04:07 PM
#144
Posted 14 September 2015 - 04:07 PM
and the seventh is in the head i.e. it's either a med laser or a med pulse laser, no ll or lpl, the more so ppc
#145
Posted 14 September 2015 - 04:09 PM
Escef, on 14 September 2015 - 04:07 PM, said:
more cbills for less performance?
How about no
sadly more cbills wouldnt make the difference between it being good or bad
Edited by Mechwarrior Buddah, 14 September 2015 - 04:10 PM.
#146
Posted 14 September 2015 - 04:12 PM
XX Sulla XX, on 14 September 2015 - 03:57 PM, said:
Well if we are asking for a change we should ask for the 350 limit The 275 is just silly.
Even if energy hardpoints are in quantity are overrated when place on slow mechs.
AEgg, on 14 September 2015 - 03:55 PM, said:
a 300 is still significantly lower, while not leaving it largely useless.
Escef, on 14 September 2015 - 04:07 PM, said:
nope.
Slow mech means gets into the fight last, cant break of to get out of trouble, and thus almost guaranteed lower scores on average, meaning any additional bonus would be pretty much moot.
#147
Posted 14 September 2015 - 04:13 PM
XX Sulla XX, on 14 September 2015 - 03:59 PM, said:
Yeah, it's not going to compare with a Timberwolf, certainly not in terms of laser vomit or gauss+laser vomit.
The timberwolf is a FAR better chassis for that, with objectively superior lasers for the purpose, and a 375XL allowing a whole bunch of DHS to be crammed in alongside simply better lasers.... While being faster, more agile, etc.
I do think it should have a lower cap than the other variants, but not what it has. I'd personally prefer 325, but I'd but at 300. I'd obviously buy at 350 too, but... Eh. I understand it being lower, as it gains the most from increased engine caps of any of the MAD's.
#148
Posted 14 September 2015 - 04:14 PM
Bishop Steiner, on 14 September 2015 - 04:12 PM, said:
a 300 is still significantly lower, while not leaving it largely useless.
I won't argue with that, all I'm saying is that it does need to have a notably lower cap than the other variants. Sure, 7 low energy hardpoints aren't amazing, but seeing as the ballistic is always going to be something heavy, you won't have tonnage to use them for anything big anyway (unless you're running an XL in a heavy...), so more is better.
#149
Posted 14 September 2015 - 04:15 PM
#150
Posted 14 September 2015 - 04:21 PM
https://twitter.com/...577754487623681
"Those concerned with the low Bounty hunter engine cap - by canon it is quite low and we followed the ratio of it vs other variants"
https://twitter.com/...577929465643008
"However we are considering a bump in its cap at least a little more and perhaps some extra torso twist - more info when we have it"
So, Russ is aware of the concern, listening, and standby for more info.
Thanks Russ.
AEgg, on 14 September 2015 - 04:14 PM, said:
I won't argue with that, all I'm saying is that it does need to have a notably lower cap than the other variants. Sure, 7 low energy hardpoints aren't amazing, but seeing as the ballistic is always going to be something heavy, you won't have tonnage to use them for anything big anyway (unless you're running an XL in a heavy...), so more is better.
Perhaps, but not every person feels the need to fill every hardpoint, either. Unless you use Small or Mediums, 7 E is a LOT, and cruising 65 kph tops is AWFUL slow for that to be the focus of your firepower, range wise.
Also, a 300-325 allows more build options, for those who don't want to build to the current MetaVomit, and allows you versatility for when the Meta shifts yet again.
Remember the QQ over the Dragonslayer when the Poptart Meta went away? Now imagine people Buying their MetaVomit Marauder, and the Meta shifting back to ballistics, etc, and the Forum Angst. I think having options, is better.
Also, Orcrist had a cool idea: Cash Register "Chaching!" Warhorn
#151
Posted 14 September 2015 - 04:24 PM
I feel like this is the best you can do with this thing. (AMS ammo is Jump Jets)
#152
Posted 14 September 2015 - 04:28 PM
Bishop Steiner, on 14 September 2015 - 04:21 PM, said:
https://twitter.com/...577754487623681
"Those concerned with the low Bounty hunter engine cap - by canon it is quite low and we followed the ratio of it vs other variants"
https://twitter.com/...577929465643008
"However we are considering a bump in its cap at least a little more and perhaps some extra torso twist - more info when we have it"
So, Russ is aware of the concern, listening, and standby for more info.
Thanks Russ.
Perhaps, but not every person feels the need to fill every hardpoint, either. Unless you use Small or Mediums, 7 E is a LOT, and cruising 65 kph tops is AWFUL slow for that to be the focus of your firepower, range wise.
Also, a 300-325 allows more build options, for those who don't want to build to the current MetaVomit, and allows you versatility for when the Meta shifts yet again.
Remember the QQ over the Dragonslayer when the Poptart Meta went away? Now imagine people Buying their MetaVomit Marauder, and the Meta shifting back to ballistics, etc, and the Forum Angst. I think having options, is better.
Also, Orcrist had a cool idea: Cash Register "Chaching!" Warhorn
This is a good thing to hear.
I've been following this thread after I found out about the 225-275 engine range for the BH. I never knew the BH had that much weaponry and so slow a mech before now.
I knew that I was going to get the $40 package hands down, but I was on the fence about the BH. I agree that a 300 engine cap would make the mech at least usable.
#153
Posted 14 September 2015 - 04:29 PM
Bishop Steiner, on 14 September 2015 - 04:12 PM, said:
Even if energy hardpoints are in quantity are overrated when place on slow mechs.
a 300 is still significantly lower, while not leaving it largely useless.
nope.
Slow mech means gets into the fight last, cant break of to get out of trouble, and thus almost guaranteed lower scores on average, meaning any additional bonus would be pretty much moot.
The hardpoints and jump jets are just not that important to be honest. Even if you gave it a 400 engine cap it would not be as good as any of the tier 1 mechs.
#154
Posted 14 September 2015 - 04:30 PM
Not only is it bad for the lore/flavor/canon of the 'Mech, but as has been said: the Black Knight, the Grasshopper, the Orion, the Cataphract, and some of the JagerMechs still need room to play. Hell, at that performance level it'd outdo a few of the Clan heavies. I know Summoners who'd trade out their Clan energy for that level of weaponry, and frankly I can think of a few Hellbingers who'd feel somewhat bullied by an 85kph Bounty Hunter too. Considering us Clan types are staring down the barrels of the Nerfblaster right now, maybe don't set your sights on supah-overpowering the Bounty Hunter?
Edited by 1453 R, 14 September 2015 - 04:31 PM.
#155
Posted 14 September 2015 - 04:31 PM
Wintersdark, on 14 September 2015 - 04:13 PM, said:
The timberwolf is a FAR better chassis for that, with objectively superior lasers for the purpose, and a 375XL allowing a whole bunch of DHS to be crammed in alongside simply better lasers.... While being faster, more agile, etc.
I do think it should have a lower cap than the other variants, but not what it has. I'd personally prefer 325, but I'd but at 300. I'd obviously buy at 350 too, but... Eh. I understand it being lower, as it gains the most from increased engine caps of any of the MAD's.
#156
Posted 14 September 2015 - 04:32 PM
#157
Posted 14 September 2015 - 04:32 PM
XX Sulla XX, on 14 September 2015 - 04:29 PM, said:
This is true, but it still has to balance against other variants of the same chassis. The 3R is also kinda getting short shrift, since no JJs and 3x Ballistics? RLY?!?!?!?!??!
#158
Posted 14 September 2015 - 04:34 PM
so I say keep the engine cap at 275 to make all these people cry
#159
Posted 14 September 2015 - 04:34 PM
1453 R, on 14 September 2015 - 04:30 PM, said:
Not only is it bad for the lore/flavor/canon of the 'Mech, but as has been said: the Black Knight, the Grasshopper, the Orion, the Cataphract, and some of the JagerMechs still need room to play. Hell, at that performance level it'd outdo a few of the Clan heavies. I know Summoners who'd trade out their Clan energy for that level of weaponry, and frankly I can think of a few Hellbingers who'd feel somewhat bullied by an 85kph Bounty Hunter too. Considering us Clan types are staring down the barrels of the Nerfblaster right now, maybe don't set your sights on supah-overpowering the Bounty Hunter?
Other Marauders can pack a 360, we are advocating for a 300-325 max. 300 is probably more likely. And uh, 300 engine size isn't going to make it a supah-overpowered Bounty Hunter, it would need an XL engine for it to take full advantage of all those hardpoints, and an XL heavy going 71 kph.... ehhhhhhhh. I'll do it, but I wouldn't say its ideal.
#160
Posted 14 September 2015 - 04:35 PM
Bishop Steiner, on 14 September 2015 - 04:32 PM, said:
11 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 11 guests, 0 anonymous users