Warhammer Quirks: Thoughts, Qq And More?
#1
Posted 15 January 2016 - 12:24 PM
So some overall decent PPC velocity buffs across the boards (30%) and a 50% for the 6R (not the 60% Russ first thought...or they toned it down since the livestream).
And a pretty hefty chunk of structure buffs. Otherwise? Not much. Which I'm OK with.
Yes, we all know they need to just BUFF velocity for PPCs and ERPPCs themselves by about 30%, instead of bandaiding "PPC MEch", but that's for a different topic (aka a "Fix PPCs thread? )
Aside from the obvious, any opinions, concerns, glaring neglects?
#2
Posted 15 January 2016 - 12:26 PM
#4
Posted 15 January 2016 - 12:31 PM
#6
Posted 15 January 2016 - 12:34 PM
Bishop Steiner, on 15 January 2016 - 12:24 PM, said:
So some overall decent PPC velocity buffs across the boards (30%) and a 50% for the 6R (not the 60% Russ first thought...or they toned it down since the livestream).
And a pretty hefty chunk of structure buffs. Otherwise? Not much. Which I'm OK with.
Yes, we all know they need to just BUFF velocity for PPCs and ERPPCs themselves by about 30%, instead of bandaiding "PPC MEch", but that's for a different topic (aka a "Fix PPCs thread? )
Aside from the obvious, any opinions, concerns, glaring neglects?
BW has the best Torso twist speed, while the 6R gets the most structure quirks.
The others aside from the 7S and BW have average torso turn speed...
BW will be a mean SOB if you can master the twist and shoot technique.
#7
Posted 15 January 2016 - 12:36 PM
That's all I have to say about those quirks.
#8
Posted 15 January 2016 - 12:38 PM
FupDup, on 15 January 2016 - 12:32 PM, said:
That's the ideal ammo count for a SINGLE UAC/5 lol.
it's a less versatile ammo poor Jagermech, that cant aim up or down?
Scout Derek, on 15 January 2016 - 12:34 PM, said:
The others aside from the 7S and BW have average torso turn speed...
BW will be a mean SOB if you can master the twist and shoot technique.
BW makes me wish we had LACs in......
#10
Posted 15 January 2016 - 12:40 PM
Bishop Steiner, on 15 January 2016 - 12:24 PM, said:
20% Ballistic Velocity on the 6R? Tailor made for dual AC20s!
El Bandito, on 13 January 2016 - 08:01 PM, said:
NIPPLES OF DOOM!
Edited by El Bandito, 15 January 2016 - 12:43 PM.
#11
Posted 15 January 2016 - 12:43 PM
Cathy, on 15 January 2016 - 12:31 PM, said:
Oh for f....
I don't understand why they keep doing that. The CPLT-K2 all over again. People using the canon PPC-arms as damage soaking shields and using the side torsos for AC10s or AC20s.
Mcgral18, on 15 January 2016 - 12:36 PM, said:
That's all I have to say about those quirks.
That's ok. The Warhammer is supposed to be a better ballistic platform than the Cataphract anyway, right?
Where's that MWO meme about how PGI decides on quirks again?
#12
Posted 15 January 2016 - 12:43 PM
Also dump the med lasers your looking at about 7 tons of ammo. and structure buffed to the max.
Or you can go 250 engine with quad ac5
Edited by reign, 15 January 2016 - 12:44 PM.
#13
Posted 15 January 2016 - 12:45 PM
Alistair Winter, on 15 January 2016 - 12:43 PM, said:
I don't understand why they keep doing that. The CPLT-K2 all over again. People using the canon PPC-arms as damage soaking shields and using the side torsos for AC10s or AC20s.
I opposed vehemently on the K2 ballistic slot misuse back in 2012, but people cried about wanting to have freedom to configure their mechs however they want. Sized hardpoints would have given mechs far more personalities, IMO, but that ship had sailed...
Edited by El Bandito, 15 January 2016 - 12:46 PM.
#14
Posted 15 January 2016 - 12:46 PM
#15
Posted 15 January 2016 - 12:48 PM
6R looks like an amazing PPC mech, 15% heat gen is awsome sauce.
Edited by Alwrath, 15 January 2016 - 12:51 PM.
#17
Posted 15 January 2016 - 12:49 PM
El Bandito, on 15 January 2016 - 12:45 PM, said:
I opposed vehemently on the K2 ballistic slot misuse back in 2012, but people cried about wanting to have freedom to configure their mechs however they want. Sized hardpoints would have given mechs far more personalities, IMO, but that ship had sailed...
or we could see 2400 m/s GaussHammers for those who couldn't aim well enough at 2000 m/s.....
#18
Posted 15 January 2016 - 12:49 PM
from day one the damn thing will be going out there with AC20,Ac10, and the rest, still 18 months and I can play a proper Mech game
#19
Posted 15 January 2016 - 12:53 PM
Bishop Steiner, on 15 January 2016 - 12:49 PM, said:
Even at 2000 m/s it's almost hit scan... 2400m/s will be hit scan....
#20
Posted 15 January 2016 - 12:54 PM
Cathy, on 15 January 2016 - 12:49 PM, said:
from day one the damn thing will be going out there with AC20,Ac10, and the rest, still 18 months and I can play a proper Mech game
I wasn't gonna use much ballistics on mine, but now, I will, just to see what you do when I kill you.
4 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 4 guests, 0 anonymous users