Mad Cat Mk Ii, The Big Cat (Or Big Alpha Wolf?). `mech Discussion
#621
Posted 17 November 2016 - 03:56 AM
In comparison a Atlas can only bring up to 19.2 tons of amour.
#622
Posted 18 January 2017 - 06:33 AM
Will update front page later with future tech coming summer 2017.
#624
Posted 18 January 2017 - 06:42 AM
#625
Posted 18 January 2017 - 06:53 AM
Hit the Deck, on 18 January 2017 - 06:42 AM, said:
He has said that yes numerous times in townhalls. Also on twitter he hint he would be surprised if it didn't show up this year (2017)
#626
Posted 18 January 2017 - 09:18 AM
I've built something along my line of thought in Smurfy using a Highlander IIC as a template. The LBX stands in for the Medium Pulse Lasers and the quartet of Machine guns because I ran out of slots, otherwise it is exactly as I envision it. Truly a "Big Alpha Wolf" as you put it in your post title. Here's the link if anyone's interested: http://mwo.smurfy-ne...4d41c6f8cd55e74
#627
Posted 19 January 2017 - 07:01 PM
Edited by Requiemking, 19 January 2017 - 07:01 PM.
#628
Posted 19 January 2017 - 07:05 PM
Requiemking, on 19 January 2017 - 07:01 PM, said:
You acting pissy about it every time it's brought up is really pathetic.
#630
Posted 19 January 2017 - 07:11 PM
Requiemking, on 19 January 2017 - 07:08 PM, said:
It's the same reason people want the Blood Asp, or wanted the Urbanmech, or the Archer, or the Warhammer, or literally any mech in the game right now. Someone liked the mech from Battletech lore or games. Everyone wants their favorite mech in the game, so of course we want this one in.
#632
Posted 20 January 2017 - 06:06 AM
So please stop this temper tantrum over it, it's annoying and it's not even a discussion for you, it's flat out insulting the way you carry on the shouting match.
#633
Posted 20 January 2017 - 07:57 AM
As i stands, with all nostalgic mechs in MWO:
#634
Posted 20 January 2017 - 08:12 AM
Metus regem, on 20 January 2017 - 07:57 AM, said:
...
Yeah, that's the optimal spot (tonnage) for a jumping Assault.
She would be able to do 2Gauss+2ERPPC with 12x DHS and 3x Class II JJs.
Not ideal but still decent. Remove the JJs and put 3 more DHS to make it 15.
But it would be a heresy. Clan scientists/engineers can't math.
#635
Posted 20 January 2017 - 08:20 AM
Hit the Deck, on 20 January 2017 - 08:12 AM, said:
She would be able to do 2Gauss+2ERPPC with 12x DHS and 3x Class II JJs.
Not ideal but still decent. Remove the JJs and put 3 more DHS to make it 15.
But it would be a heresy. Clan scientists/engineers can't math.
Well I wouldn't go that far, the Timber Wolf is in the sweet spot, the Mk III is in the sweet spot, the Mk IV was just dumb a addition, but the Mk II, at 85t would be in the perfect spot, at 85t she can run the exact same build as the 90t version with 1t left over....
#636
Posted 20 January 2017 - 08:27 AM
Metus regem, on 20 January 2017 - 08:20 AM, said:
But with less crit slots because of 1 less engine heatsink capacity. Not that it really matters anyway.
#637
Posted 20 January 2017 - 08:40 AM
Hit the Deck, on 20 January 2017 - 08:27 AM, said:
When I say identical builds I mean identical builds, the Mad Cat Mk. II only has 13 DHS in TT, you can fit an additional 3 DHS into a 340 series (4*85 = 340), the only advantage that the 90t unit has, is that it could fit a fourth DHS into it's 360 series engine, if it had 14 DHS.
As it stands, both with 13t of FF armour (it's armour in TT, 1t under for max optimal for a 85t mech, 2t under max optimal for a 90t mech), 13 cDHS, 2 cGR, 2 cLRM/10's, 4 cERML, 4t GR ammo, 2t LRM ammo, 3 JJ's with an Endo Steel frame, 85t just does it a little more effectively, that 1t savings could be a 4th DHS, or a 4th JJ or maxing out the armour, all with out giving anything up, so why 90t I can only guess it was Microsoft, and CGL just went with it.
#638
Posted 20 January 2017 - 09:04 AM
Metus regem, on 20 January 2017 - 08:40 AM, said:
Yeah sorry for the confusion. I mean in general - that a 85 tonner will have 2 less crit slots if it wants to match speed with a 90 tonner and put lots of DHS (more than 10 + the 90 tonner's max engine heatsink cap). This is only taken into consideration if you want to mount a good number of DHS like in an energy + missile build, for example.
#639
Posted 20 January 2017 - 09:09 AM
Hit the Deck, on 20 January 2017 - 09:04 AM, said:
No problem HtD, but with how MWO does engines on battle mechs, and what we've seen with the MAD-IIC, an 85t Mad Cat Mk. II would have an engine cap of 400 anyways, so engine DHS in MWO is a moot point anyways. In TT I will grant you, that having that extra internal DHS is nice, but I'm not sure it's worth the engine weight increase, as all DHS are true DHS in TT.
#640
Posted 20 January 2017 - 09:24 AM
8 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 8 guests, 0 anonymous users