#41
Posted 27 February 2016 - 04:57 AM
#42
Posted 27 February 2016 - 05:06 AM
Also, this thing is probably going to be nearly useless. Thanks, but no thanks PGI. Unless you give me the LAM version. I'd buy that. It'll still be useless, but it'll be FUN and useless.
Edited by Livestick, 27 February 2016 - 05:07 AM.
#43
Posted 27 February 2016 - 05:06 AM
#44
Posted 27 February 2016 - 05:12 AM
#45
Posted 27 February 2016 - 05:23 AM
- Looks slim, good hitboxes probable.
- High engine cap - 325 most likely as they come with 270s.
- High JJ capacity, class IV JJs are very good, can jump as well as the shadow cat.
- ECM on several canon variants. Highly likely imo there will be an ECM variant.
It will need hardpoint inflation, but as most variants come with 3-4 energy, its not a big stretch to see it with 5-6 energy somewhere. It does have the problem of most variants having all arm mounted weapons, but that doesnt cause the enforcer too many problems. I think it will be a very good addition to the game.
#47
Posted 27 February 2016 - 05:29 AM
I can't recall 30 years ago or so when started playing table top Battletech with my friends who introduced it to me anyone in person ever acting like the *** nor expert on everything and all around critic who knows better like half the folks here do ,about , well everything.
I'll buy it and gift a few packs too because being comfortable in life with disposable income for hobbies ( seriously ,compared to motorcycles , Jeeps , and such, MWO is pennies in comparison ) is a good thing, but the real bonus is pissing off all the whiners , the "experts" , and the campaigners against MWO who still bother to post , by buying mech packs they don't like.
Also make sure to add at least one lrm 5 at least to make the rage of the Pattons (who are also unemployed 3D modelers and concept art artists with MBA's and a background in C++ )even more, just for the sake of it.
That's the one thing that's always perplexed me , how are so may genius strategist and experts in everything not wealthy beyond measure with all their knowledge and instead posting from their yacht(s)?
#48
Posted 27 February 2016 - 05:42 AM
Cathy, on 27 February 2016 - 05:20 AM, said:
Where's my Crusader though
That gun being held by the hand had better be there in game and disappear if I do not use that hard point. Hell I want one for each hand, I will be all like https://youtu.be/9-cPWheNyaA?t=30
#49
Posted 27 February 2016 - 05:42 AM
#50
Posted 27 February 2016 - 05:45 AM
Dahkoht, on 27 February 2016 - 05:29 AM, said:
I am the same way. When I hear the endless complaints about the cost of packs I think to myself 'git gud at real life'.
#52
Posted 27 February 2016 - 05:50 AM
Chados, on 27 February 2016 - 05:42 AM, said:
It would be cool if they transform somewhat when the JJs are engaged (they also function as outlets)!
Dahkoht, on 27 February 2016 - 05:48 AM, said:
You will learn to love the 3PV!
#53
Posted 27 February 2016 - 05:53 AM
Aetes Nakatomi, on 27 February 2016 - 05:45 AM, said:
I am the same way. When I hear the endless complaints about the cost of packs I think to myself 'git gud at real life'.
It's a guarantee that once the official pack goes on sale , the thread will have a few saying they "can't sell it at that price , it's too expensive."
Then on release day of it half the lances will be all Phoenix Hawks just as past releases of mechs.
But they " won't sell at that super duper expensive price of 30 bucks"
I had to bust *** earlier in life bartending and waiting tables at two jobs through school and so on but never remember being jealous of those who had gotten ahead.
Most especially I never remember telling any merchant , of any item , that's too expensive , you have to lower the price because I can't pay it.
#54
Posted 27 February 2016 - 05:59 AM
#55
Posted 27 February 2016 - 06:03 AM
Livestick, on 27 February 2016 - 05:06 AM, said:
Personally I would wait with such judgments until I could see said 'Mech directly in the game.
But of course, you are entitled to your opinion.
Edited by martian, 27 February 2016 - 06:03 AM.
#56
Posted 27 February 2016 - 06:03 AM
So. What.
3LL?
3LPL?
#57
Posted 27 February 2016 - 06:05 AM
Couldn't resist.
I grew up on Robotech and I love the veritechs and destroids, I love Battletech too but I've never been as fond of the revised Unseen 'mechs.
#58
Posted 27 February 2016 - 07:25 AM
Sigilum Sanctum, on 26 February 2016 - 09:15 PM, said:
Clearly in one of the pylons on the back, duh.
You mean the super sized workbench clamps...
Other than it being a "Phoenix Hawk" it (at least to me) is underwhelming. Similar to how a donkey has the same likeness to a thoroughbred.
The thighs are just ugly, the same pauldrons (that never existed before) are ugly and the head is bulbous. The tiny pewpew gun looks pathetic, but at least its gun-like.
Edited by rolly, 27 February 2016 - 07:27 AM.
#59
Posted 27 February 2016 - 07:35 AM
I love this thing. I cannot wait.
#60
Posted 27 February 2016 - 08:07 AM
7 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 7 guests, 0 anonymous users