Gyrok, on 28 March 2016 - 01:29 PM, said:
-20% twist speed
-10 deg yaw angle (twist angle)
-5% accel/decel
-10% reverse speed
You are losing 20% speed and 10% angle, plus losing another chunk of accel/decel mobility...
That is significant...I swear it was 30%, but I double checked and we were both wrong, it is 20% and 10%
I would avoid using that combo. If I have to use the arms instead (in conjunction with the TBR-A's LT), it would be better for the Timberwolf instead of stacking those penalties ontop of 2 JJs for the energy torso... The high mounts are nice up to a certain point.
Quote
At work, working from memory, forgive me if I miss one somewhere...
As for the rest of it...since the IIC mechs are worse than their omni counterparts, pretty much across the board (a few niche builds does not a new king of the hill make)...omnimechs are more than relevant. Clans do not even have decent battlemechs at all beyond the HBK-IIC and IIC-A, and 2 of the J-IICs. The KDK may change that...it may end up being a better EXE with no mobility in spite of MASC too...so we shall see I suppose. Knowing PGI, I would not hold my breath.
I don't think they are at all. Jenners outside of the Oxide are not even a consideration (I would run the IIC equivalent of laservomit instead of the IS Jenner) and the Hunchback IICs while not having any quirks still have better high mounts (because there are two "hunches" instead of one) for specific purposes.
Considering the Orion and Highlander have nearly zero play, their IIC counterparts share that fate (kinda like the Jenner, but not to the same degree - going 160kph in a Jenner-IIC has a slightly different niche).
Quote
Except the most relevant clan mechs are still omnimechs, in spite of the supposed IIC advantage...
The problem that no one wants to admit is that the IIC mechs have to rely on clan weapons...weapons that have been nerfed so hard they have trouble with super quirked IS mechs using super quirked IS weapons.
Dude, if I could run Clan weapons on IS mechs, I would. So, don't give me that line. I would immediately remove multitudes of IS Meds and IS LL in favor of more CERMEDs in many situations. Heck, I'll take CSPL over ISMPL just for funsies. Don't get me started on running CMPL over ISLPL.
Don't even go there.
Quote
Going 75 instead of 70 is not a huge victory...mind you...and you run less ammo/armor to get to that 225. I guess it depends on what you have as a personal life expectancy in that mech.
My preference is not being too slow to getting to the battle (plus positioning). Slowly myself down unnecessarily is why I don't like the stock engine (heck, if anyone is running a STD 200 on the original Hunchback, you may have a problem).
Quote
Because it was so asininely broken that it was OP by a mile...that was the last time LRMs were legitimately a thing...which is to say they will never be that broken again.
Outside of lurmaggeddons? lol no
Quote
If you drive lights/mediums, try that dakka shawk sometime...it is seriously a suppression machine. You have to work for the kills...but you can literally, single handedly, hold off an entire push with that 1 mech.
I am not annoyed by AC2 mechs. They tickle. Mechs with at least Tri-AC5s? I'll scatter like the winds.
Quote
Or, you are the last one left/one of few left because your team effed up, or you get flanked by a lance of oxide/J-IIC and get a ST smoked while engaging a much larger force because your team is mostly dead, or you...
You get the idea...
That sounds more of an issue of situational play, than the problems that exist with IS/Clan XL engines.
Quote
That is just it though, the structure quirks give IS XL mechs a good 2-3 more chances to make mistakes...what is enough?
Noooo... not even close. It's enough for an extra large alpha (and that's being generous as it's much lower than that). Clan XL allows for that damage to be reduced through damage transfer to the CT. I can literally deal with that.
Moldur, on 28 March 2016 - 02:21 PM, said:
I am going to spew technical information without a real goal in mind, while lacing it with several biased assumptions stated as fact until an opponent attempts a rebuttal in the same fashion, at which point I will spew more technical information and assumptions. This battle of wits will go on like this until my opponent makes a critical error and fails to recall or procure a correct piece of data, at which point I will attack and show his glaring ignorance on the subject. Everyone shall then determine that I am the winner, and I will have contributed a great deal to the wealth of knowledge on MWO forums at the cost of potential thread derailment.
Welcome to MWO. Please enjoy the ForumWarrioring.