Kubernetes, on 26 April 2016 - 12:05 PM, said:
It's analogous in that it's an example of teammates refusing to do simple things to help out other teammates and thereby contribute to victory.
Okay, but it's not analogous in that people expect you to stand next to them just because they stand out in the open, they don't bring AMS, they bring a slow mech, they don't bring their own ECM, etc etc while everybody else who isn't a scrublord baddie crutchbaby manages without ECM because they don't play like bads.
In other words, you have to babysit somebody else because they need a crutch while in your crappy analogy you apparently have people ignoring a target right in front of them for no good reason.
Quote
I personally love mediums best and love to be on the leading edge of a flank, but if my assault lance is straggling and I see an Oxide wolfpack headed their way, I go back to help. It's not what I want to do, but it's the best thing to do if I want to win.
That's different because you're actually engaging the enemy that way (in a not suicidal move), so unless you somehow see a much higher priority target then what else would you do in
that situation besides go back and help? I guess if your targets that you were about to flank actually
were a higher priority then yeah it would be a bad move to help your assault lance, but otherwise go back and help if you need to in that situation.
Let's think about this in another way, if that wolfpack attacking the assault lance consisted of a bunch of cheetahs with ECM, would they be doing a bad job because they weren't being an ECM crutch for their scrublord teammates?
Quote
But whatever, do your own thing. Just don't cry when you get steamrolled because your assault lance got buried in the opening minutes.
If it's because they got rained on by LRMs due to being bad then there wasn't much hope anyways.
Edited by Pjwned, 26 April 2016 - 12:46 PM.