Catamount, on 19 July 2012 - 06:13 PM, said:
So far, Suprentus's arguments if you boil them down to what they really are, amount to "ponies and furries don't belong on a BT/MW forum, because they don't, because they don't, because they don't". The complaint isn't that it's not BT/MW irrelevant, or that there is any more disruption of the rest of the community by these groups than otherwise occurs from general thread derailment inherent to the internet, since that hasn't been notably demonstrated, no; it's just that they're a "buzzkill".
Yes. It's not a hard concept to understand. I don't know why you're trying to make it one.
Catamount, on 19 July 2012 - 06:13 PM, said:
But that word doesn't really mean anything that amounts to an explanation; it's just an arbitrarily assigned term that amounts to another way of saying "I hate them being here", so it's just a rephrase of not wanting them here, not an explanation of why. Hence, the argument is "they don't belong here, just because they don't".
Geez, do you really need me to explain what a buzzkill is to you? A generally accepted definition of buzzkill is "something that spoils or ruins an otherwise enjoyable event." Here's the kicker though: what constitutes as something that spoils or ruins an otherwise enjoyable event is subjective. If a subjective answer isn't good enough for you, then maybe you should learn how to recognize an opinion when you see one. In this case, I attempt to gauge not only my reaction to ponies and furries, but the reaction of "haters" in general. Sort of like trying to put my finger on the pulse of our social consciousness. My conclusion is as follows: mechs are cool, ponies and furries are not, and I am not the only one who holds this opinion.
Really, that's all it boils down to. It's an opinion. Could you really expect anything other than an opinionated response to a question of opinion? Someone asked the simple question why people don't like seeing pony threads, and my explanation is "mechs are cool, ponies and furries are not."
Once again, it's an opinion. Someone asked the simple question why people don't like seeing pony threads, and my explanation is "mechs are cool, ponies and furries are not."
Look around, and you can see other people in this thread posting pretty much the same explanation I did. Clearly, my explanation of why people don't like seeing pony threads isn't too far off the mark.
Now some have taken this explanation as either an attack, or as something failing the test of objectivity when the answer was subjective to begin with. To those I say, you totally miss the point, and you don't even know what you're arguing about anymore.
Catamount, on 19 July 2012 - 06:13 PM, said:
Okay, anyone is entitled to make such an argument, but I can't see how anyone would take it seriously since it doesn't answer the question at hand, as much as said poster dances around constantly trying to claim it does.
Q: Why all the hate on bronies and furries?
A: mechs are cool, ponies and furries are not
That's an answer. Just because you reject it doesn't mean it's not an answer. Try having an open mind when reading people's posts.
Catamount, on 19 July 2012 - 06:13 PM, said:
Of course, calmly explaining what one finds wrong with Suprentus' logic apparently elicits vitriolic responses that accuse one of "self-righteous rant[s]" (I don't think those words mean what he thinks they mean), but okay. I think I can live with that.
I am vitriolic, huh? (I don't think that word means what you think it means) I don't think self-righteous rants mean a sense of smug moral sense of moral superiority? Given that I single out bronies and furries for my own "ire" (which is a complete lie), I'd say that description was pretty accurate of your rant.