Jump to content

"competitive" Round Table With Russ

News Social

195 replies to this topic

#121 Marius Evander

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 1,113 posts

Posted 01 April 2017 - 04:33 PM

View PostMonkey Lover, on 01 April 2017 - 01:27 PM, said:

I would support removing group Q if they do 1v1 2v2 8v8 and 12v12 comp q. 12 v12 games might be really hard to get but they could always go-to cw.


I think 1v1 and 8v8 would be enough since 12v12 is FW/CW or solo queue QP. to justify the removal of 12v12 Group QP

View PostDavegt27, on 01 April 2017 - 04:03 PM, said:

Could you imagine going full potato tournament


How do you stop people smurfing pretending to be potatoes?

#122 MischiefSC

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Benefactor
  • The Benefactor
  • 16,697 posts

Posted 01 April 2017 - 04:52 PM

View PostQuicksilver Kalasa, on 01 April 2017 - 01:32 PM, said:

Some maps are still tradey, but there is a definite slight towards push drop decs. Even if it weren't cSPLs, it would be SRMs, LPL/ML rushes.


A comp queue won't ever be that split, which is why the new ranked mode will be 8v8 only.


In another thread where someone was arguing that LRMs were just as good or better than direct fire in comp play Div A/B "on the right maps used by the right players" I went through and watched most of last seasons MRBC matches.

It's a huge difference now between the top handful and just about everyone else. It used to seem like matches were very snipe heavy, a few kills up and push all across the board. There still were matches like that but a lot of the big Div A names were fast and brutal. Especially the light drops - most under 3 minutes. Even the heavy drops were often only 4-6 minutes and half of that was positioning.

Honestly? A lot more fun to watch.

#123 justcallme A S H

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • CS 2020 Referee
  • CS 2020 Referee
  • 8,987 posts
  • LocationMelbourne, AU

Posted 01 April 2017 - 04:58 PM

View PostQuicksilver Kalasa, on 01 April 2017 - 09:19 AM, said:

I think you meant KDK-3s/MAD-IICs/NGRs/HBK-IICs/HMNs/ACHs
Chances are the duplicates will be Night Gyrs considering how close in performance HBK-IICs and Huntsman are and considering how powerful both the KDK-3 and MAD-IIC are.


Yep, the too. With Nova's in the first brawler drop for good measure.

#124 Johnny Z

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Knight Errant
  • 9,942 posts
  • LocationDueling on Solaris

Posted 01 April 2017 - 05:01 PM

View PostMechaBattler, on 01 April 2017 - 04:17 PM, said:

Why can't we have a ForumWarrior roundtable?


They already tried that.



#125 Nightmare1

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 7,636 posts
  • Twitch: Link
  • LocationPeeking over your shoulder while eating your cookies.

Posted 01 April 2017 - 06:23 PM

I wasn't able to watch and, frankly, don't really have the time to do so. Does anyone know if a Good Samaritan posted Cliff's Notes of it somewhere?

#126 Quicksilver Aberration

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Nightmare
  • The Nightmare
  • 12,079 posts
  • LocationKansas City, MO

Posted 01 April 2017 - 07:14 PM

View PostUltimax, on 01 April 2017 - 04:23 PM, said:

This is one of my bigger concerns for a competitive mode.

Luckily conquest isn't near as bad as domination, sure some sides play differently in conquest, but they aren't as lopsided. Domination has some serious positioning issues that need ironing out before I really consider it acceptable for comp play.

#127 Mcgral18

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • CS 2019 Top 8 Qualifier
  • CS 2019 Top 8 Qualifier
  • 17,987 posts
  • LocationSnow

Posted 01 April 2017 - 07:15 PM

View PostQuicksilver Kalasa, on 01 April 2017 - 07:14 PM, said:

Luckily conquest isn't near as bad as domination, sure some sides play differently in conquest, but they aren't as lopsided. Domination has some serious positioning issues that need ironing out before I really consider it acceptable for comp play.


I found that Alpine change pretty funny


They didn't change the imbalance at all, just shifted it entirely from one team to the other.

#128 Ultimax

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 6,979 posts

Posted 01 April 2017 - 08:03 PM

View PostQuicksilver Kalasa, on 01 April 2017 - 07:14 PM, said:

Luckily conquest isn't near as bad as domination, sure some sides play differently in conquest, but they aren't as lopsided. Domination has some serious positioning issues that need ironing out before I really consider it acceptable for comp play.


Agree on conquest, I still find a few maps to give adv when the teams are really close in skill - but Domination is definitely the real problem and is basically unusable on many maps for comp play.

#129 Reza Malin

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Overlord
  • Overlord
  • 617 posts
  • LocationUK

Posted 02 April 2017 - 12:51 AM

View PostGas Guzzler, on 31 March 2017 - 07:22 AM, said:


Except for when, you know, it isn't. Like after the great PPC nerf of 2014, LPL/ML or cLPL/cERML was the way to go on both sides. It really hasn't always been the meta, its just that right as Clans were getting great PPFLD mechs like the KDK, they nerfed lasers (specifically the IS laser boats that were complained about) as well as some of the dakka mechs that the IS had such as the Mauler MX90 and the Black Widow.


Well if you want to drag up the entire weapon log of MWO since beta, then ok yes it hasn't. For example, you mention ERML which i presume you mean when clans first launched and they were heinously OP, before clans got nerfed into oblivion. You really count that period for any kind of reflection on balancing or meta? Posted Image

Also, do you change every context of a comment to suit some smartass reply?

I meant recently, and assumed that went without saying. So, to clarify to save any further obtuse context assumption, i am talking in the past year, PPFLD has been king for the more top tier players that know how to employ them.

Ill say again, recently, as in what is prevalent in recent times, weeks, months, up to a year, not 3 years ago or when clans first launched.

Yes i am sure your brain is racing now for another smartass reply telling me some examples of top tier players not using PPFLD and of course there are some niche examples. Generally though, PPC/gauss/IS A/C is a safe bet in far more matches than anything else, and reduces TTK more than any other weapon type is capable of unless you are shooting at morons.

#130 Mystere

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 22,783 posts
  • LocationClassified

Posted 02 April 2017 - 03:49 AM

View Postslide, on 29 March 2017 - 06:01 PM, said:

Won't be attending, won't be listening later and really don't care about the competitive scene anyway.

Whilst I applaud PGI for doing something with the community I really wish they would stop diluting their already limited time and energy and putting it into improving aspects of the game that 95% of the community can actually be involved with.

Maps
Modes
Balance (overall not to bad but will always need work)
Fixing FP (the so called end game content) into something that everyone can play.
Adding/fixing the above will get more people spending more money than the elite few that have the skills/time/money can ever hope to spend.

If you want to help the elite few, great go ahead, but don't do it at the expense of the rest of the player base who simply wont care. (me included)



Can PGI just dispense with this "competitive" nonsense and delusion and just give us something that is deservedly "A BattleTech Game"?

Is that really too difficult? <smh>


View PostBLOOD WOLF, on 29 March 2017 - 06:19 PM, said:

Guys this is about comp scence improvement ...


Which 95%+ of the player base probably do not give a flying **** about.

Edited by Mystere, 02 April 2017 - 03:52 AM.


#131 Mystere

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 22,783 posts
  • LocationClassified

Posted 02 April 2017 - 03:56 AM

View PostWil McCullough, on 29 March 2017 - 08:41 PM, said:

sensitive people should not run companies.


Or, much much worse, countries with enough nuclear weapons to wipe out humanity several times over. <shrugs>

#132 Mystere

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 22,783 posts
  • LocationClassified

Posted 02 April 2017 - 04:07 AM

View PostTLBFestus, on 30 March 2017 - 08:18 AM, said:

As to the side discussion about how it doesn't matter "how" things are said rather than what is said, this is typical BS commentary from people on the internet who talk a tough game from behind a keyboard but would never do it face to face.


Yeah, I'd love to see these "tough guys" talk like that in front of heavily-armed mujahideen fighters.

#133 Marius Romanis

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Heavy Lifter
  • Heavy Lifter
  • 528 posts

Posted 02 April 2017 - 04:25 AM

View PostNightmare1, on 01 April 2017 - 06:23 PM, said:

I wasn't able to watch and, frankly, don't really have the time to do so. Does anyone know if a Good Samaritan posted Cliff's Notes of it somewhere?


Ive seen it linked in 3 threads

#134 Mystere

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 22,783 posts
  • LocationClassified

Posted 02 April 2017 - 04:39 AM

View PostMechaBattler, on 01 April 2017 - 04:17 PM, said:

Why can't we have a ForumWarrior roundtable?


Sure, as long your post count determines the weight of your opinion. Posted Image

#135 Nightmare1

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 7,636 posts
  • Twitch: Link
  • LocationPeeking over your shoulder while eating your cookies.

Posted 02 April 2017 - 07:29 AM

View PostCadoAzazel, on 02 April 2017 - 04:25 AM, said:


Ive seen it linked in 3 threads


I've been canvassing some of the threads but haven't found the link yet, lol. Thanks though, I'll keep looking! :)

#136 Bud Crue

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Rage
  • Rage
  • 9,994 posts
  • LocationOn the farm in central Minnesota

Posted 02 April 2017 - 07:31 AM

https://mwomercs.com...nd-table-notes/

#137 Nightmare1

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 7,636 posts
  • Twitch: Link
  • LocationPeeking over your shoulder while eating your cookies.

Posted 02 April 2017 - 07:34 AM

View PostBud Crue, on 02 April 2017 - 07:31 AM, said:



Thanks Bud!

#138 Revis Volek

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The 1 Percent
  • The 1 Percent
  • 7,247 posts
  • Google+: Link
  • Facebook: Link
  • LocationBack in the Pilots chair

Posted 02 April 2017 - 07:36 AM

View PostMystere, on 02 April 2017 - 03:49 AM, said:



Which 95%+ of the player base probably do not give a flying **** about.



Yup, no one cares....


https://mrbcleague.com/signups

#139 Nightmare1

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 7,636 posts
  • Twitch: Link
  • LocationPeeking over your shoulder while eating your cookies.

Posted 02 April 2017 - 07:39 AM

View PostRevis Volek, on 02 April 2017 - 07:36 AM, said:



Yup, no one cares....


https://mrbcleague.com/signups


I'm already signed! :D

Btw, do you know if that MechWarrior Arena site is for real? It looks dead...

#140 Revis Volek

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The 1 Percent
  • The 1 Percent
  • 7,247 posts
  • Google+: Link
  • Facebook: Link
  • LocationBack in the Pilots chair

Posted 02 April 2017 - 07:43 AM

View PostNightmare1, on 02 April 2017 - 07:39 AM, said:


I'm already signed! Posted Image

Btw, do you know if that MechWarrior Arena site is for real? It looks dead...



They havent done much with Arena for a year or so now, id love to see it make a come back.


I like me some 1v1.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users