naterist, on 03 May 2018 - 02:35 PM, said:
harmoney golds exhibit A in there reply to pgis reply to harmoney golds reply to pgis request for summary judgement.
this is the liscensing agreement between tatsunoko and harmoney gold dated to march 22 2012, and it says this is the current contract, and all other contracts are null and void and this is the only one that counts.
it says that hg has the merchandising rights to macross, and thats it. also denies hg the rights to any video game adaptations. this seems like a smoking gun against HG that says they have no rights to the characters, just the right to market the movie, and it explicitly states no video games, and hbs battletech and mwo are video games.
so they admit not having the rights to the characters AND no rights to a video game version of macross. and harmoney gold is giving the courts this. it seems to directly contradict what theyve been saying about their rights and everything. it does say it expires in 5 years unless resigned, but they wouldnt have entered it as evidence if it wasnt still valid right?
DFM, on 03 May 2018 - 06:28 PM, said:
What HG hasn't provided is PROOF of that. Oh they've said a bunch, quite literally, "She-said,He-said,They-said" or I'm HG's lawyer, and their lawyer told me that they told them that
evilauthor, on 03 May 2018 - 06:37 PM, said:
This is a purported copy of the associated e-mails: https://drive.google...68bWcmoC8K2TAgc
Edited by Horseman, 03 May 2018 - 08:14 PM.