Tesunie, on 26 February 2018 - 05:52 PM, said:
One of my problems with your statement and using the Jarls list is something Koniving did mention. Look at the ranks and number of matches played. The top #1 player for season 19 only has 84 games played... #3 only 111. #7 is more respectable with 255 games but for statistical averages that can be seen as rather low still. #17 only has 117 matches under his belt. #22, not even 100 matches yet (99 matches, so very close).
I'm not even off the first page yet of the stat chart there. those with several hundred (to thousand) games have earned their place and rank. But if it's under 100 matches... That isn't very conclusive at that point.
On that I totally agree. Once someone has 400-500 games under their belt, then we are talking some good averages and sample size of games and not just easy matches in T5 on a fresh account, which indeed does skew things.
That said most of those alt-accounts are those of already top ranking players (Nero for example is Juju's). I know who they all are coincidentally, save for one but I suspect I know who
Tesunie, on 26 February 2018 - 05:52 PM, said:
But, no one person's advice should be the "be all and end all" of advice. Different people do play differently, and with different skills. I mean no disrespect to you, but you've been kinda sounding like "listen to me, ignore everyone else" a bit in this thread. I've been presuming I'm just reading too far into the posts and seeing something not intended...
Again totally agree. Different horses for different courses. I can give people a build for any play style/range or whatever. My advice will always come from the "upper end" point of view, becuase that is where I am. Not the best, never claimed to be, just well above average.
Spare Parts
wants to get better, I will give the best info to make this possible. Making repeated statements about LBX2s are amazing when they flat out are were proven (in a Private Lobby) not to where Headless Chicken (AC2s) tore Koniving to pieces repeatadly (LBX2).
^ that right there is where my main issue is, Then to go further and claim over 30 in top 100 have been hackers?
That stuff is not on and if I was running these forums, those type of posts are the ones that would be incurring warnings because it helps no-one when you knowingly mislead/lie in the face of fact/evidence.