Imperius, on 17 March 2018 - 02:20 AM, said:
"He” is referring to Chris not you.
Then congrats! We now have found your next deficit: Bad written communication skills.
Imperius, on 17 March 2018 - 02:20 AM, said:
From my understanding when I talked to Chris.
Well, I can't help myself there but given the level of "understanding" you have shown so far I won't trust your "understanding" of what Chris was talking about either.
Imperius, on 17 March 2018 - 02:20 AM, said:
If other mechs can’t do it too and that something gives that certain loadout a clear advantage over other mechs in its class it’s considered an outlier, and will brought into spec of the other mechs in its class.
So now you're switching to a third souce that used the "outlier" terminology ... and in possibily yet another frame of reference. But in that particular context:
So where's the clear advantage over the other mechs of the same class? Are you going to limit your feeble attempt to a "raw dps and damage potential" or will you actually have a look at what other mechs of the same class can bring to the table? Like more armor - incl. stealth armor in case of IS-ECM-lights -, in many cases jump jets, actual weapon and survival quirks ...
Imperius, on 17 March 2018 - 02:20 AM, said:
What are outliers in the data?
Definition of outliers An outlier is an observation that lies an abnormal distance from other values in a random sample from a population. In a sense, this definition leaves it up to the analyst (or a consensus process) to decide what will be considered abnormal. Before abnormal observations can be singled out, it is necessary to characterize normal observations.
Then by all means: Show those numbers for the PIR-1 ~laugh~
Imperius, on 17 March 2018 - 02:20 AM, said:
The analysts would be Chris.
No, that "analyst" right here is you because right here you're the one doing his "feely-craft" where you describe the PIR-1 as an outlier that has "insane dps" with those "insane 12 mg" that - by your demands - needs to be reigned in.
Imperius, on 17 March 2018 - 02:20 AM, said:
As i said before I talked to him for a good while at MechCon. I wasn’t very enthused with that philosophy because it just make everything mediocre and removes uniqueness.
Which make your line of argument in here even more "confusing" and dishonest, since your demand goes counter what you claim to believe yourself.
Imperius, on 17 March 2018 - 02:20 AM, said:
My favorite weight class and chassis suffered because of that philosophy. So I just want to keep things in check.
So you just wish for others to suffer because you suffered - whether or not that particular suffering was deserved or not - ... What a spiteful and lovely personality you are.
Imperius, on 17 March 2018 - 02:20 AM, said:
Since your group seems to constantly ask for buffs directly or indirectly (nerfing other classes as a whole)
"My group"?
Imperius, on 17 March 2018 - 02:20 AM, said:
I used to drop in balance posts here and there and say my opinion and move on. That was a mistake.
Let's just say that I can't agree with you there. You moving on - on several levels - would certainly not be a mistake.
Imperius, on 17 March 2018 - 02:20 AM, said:
I want you to understand something completely.
The fallacious nature of your arguments, in conjunction with hypocrisy and intellectual dishonesty and outright lies are bound to make me understand only one thing: The communication with you can only serve my personal entertainment.
Edited by Der Geisterbaer, 17 March 2018 - 02:46 AM.