DaZur, on 13 February 2019 - 11:57 AM, said:
What I do take issue with is players like you who pay zero recognition to this being a team game and infer the survival of the tail-end-charlies or any one mech should fall wholly upon their shoulders.
Again... "team game".
No teammate should be considered "dispensable"... Even potatoes contribute to the potential shared armor tonnage and aggregate damage potential.
If your personal survival outweighs the success of the team... Yeah, that's selfish. Color me overly idealistic I guess.
Again... "team game".
No teammate should be considered "dispensable"... Even potatoes contribute to the potential shared armor tonnage and aggregate damage potential.
If your personal survival outweighs the success of the team... Yeah, that's selfish. Color me overly idealistic I guess.
Uh, no. It's a team game, and splitting off to try to help someone with poor positioning just screws over the team. I absolutely hate when people get themselves out of position and then scream "help me." One of three things happens:
(1) They die alone, as they should, because they are out of position. It's your own responsibility to stay with the team or put your mech in a position where it is the most effective. This is the best outcome.
(2) One or more mechs break off from the main group to go help that person. He/she dies anyway, and now the team is split with half of it in a bad position. We get stomped because the team is split.
(3) One or more mechs break off from the main group to go help that person. He/she survives, but badly damaged. Now the team is split with half of it in a bad position and, again, we get stomped because the team is split.
If you want to support the team, don't split off to go help the person who put themselves in a bad position. We are all better off with one dead teammate rather than a split and poorly positioned team.
Edited by GoodTry, 14 February 2019 - 08:01 AM.