Knownswift, on 13 October 2022 - 01:35 PM, said:
I guess what has be stuck on that is.. Why does skin color require serious exposition.
It isn't a historical piece.
Because the show doesn't exist in a vacuum - it's playing in someone else's sandbox. In that situation, making a change that either a ) is an inconsistency or b ) has substantial implications to established lore simply isn't something you do without going out of your way to ensure you have a way to get your audience to buy in on the change.
Of course, the showrunners also messed up by deciding they have to focus on "recognizable" parts of the Middle-Earth's history and then to paint in "representation" by numbers (quotes because I consider such poor handling of it to be a crude and blatantly obvious attempt at pandering rather than true representation of any given ethnicity or culture) instead of setting it in a location and context where it would have been a natural and logical consequence, especially when there's a few cultures and nations that the source material leaves largely unexplored and where the showrunners would have almost complete freedom to do whatever because there's not much pre-existing lore to compete with.
But we're getting sidetracked. Battletech show and dated cultural portrayals? There's several ways to examine these tropes, subvert them, deconstruct them or even reconstruct them. Tradition in clinging to a mythologized depiction of a past culture is kinda an in-universe hat already (specifically for the Kuritans). The
real smart move would be having a leader who is not just
aware of certain tropes but actively
exploits them for their own gain, such as deliberately cultivating a ridiculous facade
because it dupes their opponents into dismissing them as a credible threat.
Edited by Horseman, 13 October 2022 - 10:03 PM.