Depressing Mech Choices
#81
Posted 27 January 2012 - 12:46 PM
Can't wait 'till this gets out!
#82
Posted 27 January 2012 - 12:49 PM
Omigir, on 27 January 2012 - 12:46 PM, said:
Suck it up and get over your self ritious 'anti anime' selves and realise that is not where MW:O is going.
#84
Posted 27 January 2012 - 12:50 PM
#86
Posted 27 January 2012 - 12:53 PM
That's actually one of my favorites from FD's page.
#87
Posted 27 January 2012 - 12:54 PM
CoffiNail, on 27 January 2012 - 12:52 PM, said:
See above, he's already done it. Bronies and all...
Edited by Paladin1, 27 January 2012 - 12:54 PM.
#88
Posted 27 January 2012 - 12:54 PM
get over it the designs look a hell of alot better then they have in years, so gives a flying rats *** you dont like it dont use it, Or if you would prefer i can refer you to BT 3015/3025 (not sure which one it was but the lams where in it along with the locust rifleman etc etc) so suck it up and drive on.
#89
Posted 27 January 2012 - 12:54 PM
#90
Posted 27 January 2012 - 12:56 PM
Edit: Like, even Clan lights and mediums look meaner than the IS. The Adder, Kit Fox, Stormcrow. Even if the thing is little it looks like it's a doombringer, hands or not.
Edited by hoax, 27 January 2012 - 01:07 PM.
#92
Posted 27 January 2012 - 12:59 PM
hoax, on 27 January 2012 - 12:56 PM, said:
Exactly, the Clanners have this `Mech look thing down...
...except when they don't.
Please don't make me whip out the 3055TRO...
#93
Posted 27 January 2012 - 01:01 PM
time for a brief history lesson ...
When battletech/mechwarrior first came out alot of the "mecha" that where invisioned where from japanese anime (some of you are correct on this point) how ever ... gundam wing wasnt even a dream at that point, and the only thing that had been released with any success was Robotech (hence the similiarities with some of the design concepts) i am not gunna go into the whole whether it was stolen or not debate cause i honestly dont care.
I see them both as seperate entities. so stop arguing over the stupid stuff
#95
Posted 27 January 2012 - 01:03 PM
Paladin1, on 27 January 2012 - 12:22 PM, said:
Yeah, I wasn't clear - I meant that the newer "look" for some were more a product of trying to make 'em work in a digital format through the various iterations of computer games. :-P
#96
Posted 27 January 2012 - 01:07 PM
#97
Posted 27 January 2012 - 01:09 PM
CoffiNail, on 27 January 2012 - 01:03 PM, said:
Nice one! I was working on one while you did that, Now we have two.
You even got the font!
Agreed with Aegis. The MW4 Catapult was a incredibly stupid design, with the cockpit front, big, flat and centre of the torso. Now it looks like a Mi-28N Havok with legs!
Edited by Zakatak, 27 January 2012 - 01:09 PM.
#98
Posted 27 January 2012 - 01:11 PM
Arbalister, on 27 January 2012 - 01:03 PM, said:
Actually I don't think it's that. The newer "look" had more to do with how the early models were generated and put into production by Ral Partha. I know for a fact that several of the older designs had serious, shall we say "problems", with being made into minis due to a number of issues in direct relation to their point of origin. Those made after a certain point in the timeline (3055) were produced with these limitations in mind and have resulted, over time, in the newer designs we know now.
Even the Clan Omnis underwent this change. The early Omnis were much thinner and slender than they appear now, especially the very first batches to be made into minis. I couldn't tell you how many Vultures I've seen with broken arms and legs because of this.
#100
Posted 27 January 2012 - 01:15 PM
3 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users