Jump to content

Facebook poll: Which of the listed 65 ton 'Mechs would you most like to use?


169 replies to this topic

#121 Evgeny Bear

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Venom
  • The Venom
  • 704 posts
  • LocationClan Wolf Occupation Zone

Posted 14 March 2012 - 02:26 AM

View PostFrOdO, on 13 March 2012 - 05:16 PM, said:

Why not just start a poll in the forums as well? To see where our heads are at as well as all of those on the Facebook.


Same Question I had in mind... stupid facebook thingy is not what I want only to enter a poll

#122 Polymorphyne

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 489 posts
  • Facebook: Link
  • LocationAustralia

Posted 14 March 2012 - 02:27 AM

Quote

Mech Jagger?


LMAO.

#123 aglarang

    Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 68 posts
  • LocationBuckminster

Posted 14 March 2012 - 05:15 AM

View PostKaemon, on 13 March 2012 - 12:23 PM, said:


You sir, have failed the poll.
Posted Image

Kaemon, I know you were trying to be cute or to impress some people here, but your fail post failed. Technically I voted in the poll on facebook and thus succeeded. This forum is not the poll and I expressed an opinion on what would be my choices. So, that was a nice try. Maybe next time you will do better. I will admit that it was original and refreshing for someone to be creative enough to post a large image with the word FAIL to demonstrate their idea. This was new and fresh. I do not think I have ever seen anything like this on the internet before. Genius I say!!! I bet genius like that could find ways to incorporate that word with others for humorous effect, like combining it with boats or trains or other methods of conveyance. Oh well, best of luck to you. Keep trying, you will get there. :)

#124 Rugarou

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • 429 posts
  • LocationDown da bayou...

Posted 14 March 2012 - 05:27 AM

Somehow I missed this yesterday dangit.. Tough choice for me as I always liked the fire support of the Jagermech, but the Axeman's overall design is stellar as well.

My choice would depend on the mission and overall role needed for its success. In general though, going on prime variant alone, I would choose the Axeman for general puposes.

#125 tyrone dunkirk

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 672 posts
  • LocationOutreach

Posted 14 March 2012 - 05:29 AM

The Axman just seems to pack a bigger, better punch than the Jagermech. More armor, more firepower, cooler looking.... the Jager just never packed enough punch to bring down an enemy mech of it's weight class without ever getting really effed up.. in my opinion.

#126 AtomBomb

    Rookie

  • 2 posts

Posted 14 March 2012 - 05:39 AM

I love Bombs, Bombardier for me. :)

#127 Der BruzZzler von Wiesndoof

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 1,494 posts
  • LocationAm Grill

Posted 14 March 2012 - 05:42 AM

My Facebook vote goes to the AXM-1N!

I like close combat brawler. The Axman is a nice mech with a cruel design. The head look a bit like a Xenomorph (Alien).
It would be nice to see this beast in MWO!

#128 MilitantMonk

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 378 posts
  • LocationMinneapolis, MN

Posted 14 March 2012 - 05:57 AM

Already mentioned but saying it again...

Bombardier is just a Catapult in diguise. Same weight, same load out, one trades speed for jump jets (that might not even be the case if it has to use 3025 tech). Why have two of the same thing at the same weight? Maybe in the future when we're flush with designs already but right now it needs to be either a sniper mech or a brawler (assuming the melee is worked out).

#129 Eidolon

    Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 58 posts
  • LocationTN

Posted 14 March 2012 - 06:28 AM

Another vote for the JagerMech. Devs say no melee so the Axman's axe is a waste of tonnage. We already have a missile boat in the Catapult so give us autocannons!

#130 Duncan Jr Fischer

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 493 posts
  • LocationKyiv

Posted 14 March 2012 - 07:01 AM

I can't vote on facebook (not into), but my choice would be Axman, a great mech, and the others are better off forgotten)

#131 Buffmeister

    Rookie

  • 1 posts

Posted 14 March 2012 - 07:10 AM

hmmm, tough choice...

thing is, both the Jager and the Bomber are both long range support....whilst the Axeman is a close in brawler.

now, seeing as in the FAQ's is says that theres no immediate plans for melee makes the Axeman a moot choice...

personally, i'd choose a Crusader variant in the 65 ton class :) a more well rounded mech imo.

so i suppose it'd have to be the Jager, though it would not be my personal choice



Buff

#132 Wyzak

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Machete
  • The Machete
  • 256 posts
  • LocationHartford, Vermont

Posted 14 March 2012 - 08:20 AM

I had an Axman included with my download of the Mektek expansion, and it did have the problems I mentioned. I'm sorry if I mistakenly implied that the Mektek team was responsible for the poor design. All I know is that it was not in the available list of mechs when I installed the Microsoft campaign, and it was available when I downloaded Mektek/NBT.

#133 AlmightyTundra

    Member

  • PipPipPip
  • Survivor
  • 81 posts
  • LocationGreenland

Posted 14 March 2012 - 08:32 AM

defently jager mech

#134 Siilk

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 504 posts

Posted 14 March 2012 - 08:43 AM

I've got the moves like Jagger...Mech. :) JM6-DD for me please.

#135 Damocles

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Hammer
  • The Hammer
  • 1,527 posts
  • LocationOakland, CA

Posted 14 March 2012 - 08:58 AM

Axman because it could lead to Berserker!
Posted Image

#136 Adridos

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bridesmaid
  • 10,635 posts
  • LocationHiding in a cake, left in green city called New A... something.

Posted 14 March 2012 - 08:59 AM

View PostDamocles, on 14 March 2012 - 08:58 AM, said:

Axman because it could lead to Berserker!
Posted Image


Poor Huron. :)

#137 SMDMadCow

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 1,055 posts
  • LocationDallas, TX

Posted 14 March 2012 - 11:13 AM

View PostDamocles, on 14 March 2012 - 08:58 AM, said:

Axman because it could lead to Berserker!
Posted Image


Thats a Scarabus. With a Salamander between its legs in the background.

#138 Roh

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 255 posts
  • LocationBaltimore, MD, US

Posted 14 March 2012 - 11:33 AM

Really dont get why Axman is even an option. I go with Bomberman!

#139 verybad

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,229 posts

Posted 14 March 2012 - 12:04 PM

View PostWyzak, on 14 March 2012 - 08:20 AM, said:

I had an Axman included with my download of the Mektek expansion, and it did have the problems I mentioned. I'm sorry if I mistakenly implied that the Mektek team was responsible for the poor design. All I know is that it was not in the available list of mechs when I installed the Microsoft campaign, and it was available when I downloaded Mektek/NBT.

Might be NBT, I believe they got a few in, we absolutely DIDN'T make an Axeman.

View Postpursang, on 14 March 2012 - 12:35 AM, said:


You're rediculous! YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE AWESOME! :)

*Ahem*

Axman all the way. :)

It's ridiculous BTW.

I suggest you learn to adress the issue in question rather than try and insult (though that was admittedly minor) people you don't agree with., we'll both enjoy our time here on the forums more, and unbased insults tend to make the insultor rather than the insultee look worse.

Edited by verybad, 14 March 2012 - 12:17 PM.


#140 Nik Van Rhijn

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,905 posts
  • LocationLost

Posted 14 March 2012 - 12:07 PM

If you go to this thread http://mwomercs.com/...s/page__st__320 P17 has FD's take on the Jagermech, along with some other fave's like the Vindicator & Wyvern.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users