Rhinehart, on 04 November 2011 - 04:42 AM, said:
Heh I know I'm throwing myself to the wolves on this one...
I never wanted to play the Clans because I thought they were created by the biggest coward that ever lived. At the end of the War of the Usurper, the Five Houses were prepared to subject civilized space to generations of warfare, even usuing Nuclear weapons. One man could've united the people behind him, defeated them and forged a new Star League, the "Hero" Alexander Kerensky. But he didn't have the stomach for that fight. So he bailed out on the entire human race excepting only those that had the means to join him and wanted to become outcasts. And the result? A society where individual freedoms only reach as far as class boundarys and where virtually any offence can and has been at one time or another justified by the phrase "For the Glory of Clan Insert name of totem animal here." Given all their infighting and poliyical squabbling the Clans seem like as society with everything the Inner Sphere has except for better Tech and less freedom in exchange for better security as long as you aren't a member of the Warrior Caste. Not that the Star League was any bed of roses if you read the history closely. Even during the "Golden Age" there was plenty of conflict if not on the vast scale of the Succession Wars. But those are the worlds we live in. I'll take my flawed Inner Sphere society thanks, especially since I have the right to fight for it no matter where my genes come from. you can keep your Clan "Honor". Honor was around long before the Clans supposedly invented it. The only thing Clan I want is some salvage and maybe a couple of pretty Bondswomen, but only if they both come with no strings attached.
I am sorry to not live up to your bait but *yawn* I have heard this argument in every single board I have gone to that is about Battletech. And I am sure you have heard many variations of the same response. It boils down to this...
1) Aleksandr Kerensky was a personal friend of the Cameron family, he saw their deaths as his personal failure, with this in mind when the successor lord told him to eff off he was shaken enough to say ok
2) He was a man of laws and ideals, he was not about to launch another war on the level of the one he just had. He said that he could not ask his soldiers to go through it again
3) The people of the Star League may have loved him but the united successor lords, or even them all just knit picking him would have winnowed his army to nothing. Not to mention that he would not go against he council as it was a part of the SL and this was what he swore to defend.
4) They abolished the Star League, his oath was to that, if the Leaders wanted to kill their people then that was their problem, he offered many solutions they just wanted to play follow the leader, closed followed by king of the hill.
5) The Clans fight with each other to hone their skills, what you see as infighting will quickly evaporate when a threat is perceived to all clans.
6) I am a Jaguar, your argument is invalid.