

Ecm: Will These Changes Stop Pubbies From Crying?
#121
Posted 29 January 2013 - 02:32 PM
#123
Posted 29 January 2013 - 02:35 PM
A single PPC, to chain-counter an ECM requires firing faster than once every 5 seconds.
To do so requires the default 10 heat sinks (w/ doubles).
In that case 9 heat / 2 hps = 4.5 seconds per shot max for steady state heat (slightly slower if moving)..
An ERPPC (@ 13 heat per shot) is going to require >2.6 hps dissipation ==> 5 extra DHS ==> 2.7hps.
13 heat / 2.7 hps = ~4.82 seconds per shot max for steady state heat (again, slightly slower if moving).
Twelve to fifteen tons of payload is easily doable for these mechs.
Due to this, I forsee the single ERPPC RVN-3L and ERPPC CDA-3M becoming used as scouts and flank harrassers, probably with "light-hunter" escorts along for the ride.
Edited by Vapor Trail, 29 January 2013 - 02:35 PM.
#124
Posted 29 January 2013 - 02:43 PM
If they decide to stay just kill them with direct fire weapons, either way they're dead.
And the PPC effect can remove the ECM cloak umbrella very effectively at range. Atlas D-DCs will not be able to cover their team anymore as Stalker PPC boats, or any other boating PPC mech, will just disrupt their ECM in addition to doing heavy damage.
The rain of LRMs that will inevitably follow will finish the job.
#126
Posted 29 January 2013 - 03:00 PM
Orzorn, on 29 January 2013 - 12:27 PM, said:
But hell yes, this is cool.
Personally I think the Command Console will be the other ECM balance factor. And then they can fine tune the modules as needed, and/or add new ones.
#127
Posted 29 January 2013 - 03:04 PM
#128
Posted 29 January 2013 - 03:07 PM
5th Fedcom Rat, on 29 January 2013 - 03:04 PM, said:
I'd like to know who the merc corps were that were/are complaining about ECM so I can laugh at them.
Again, premades and pubbies aren't mutually exclusive.
#129
Posted 29 January 2013 - 03:11 PM
So an ECM light heading directly towards a stationary enemy mech will cover the 70m ECM-Free-Zone in just under 2 seconds.
#130
Posted 29 January 2013 - 03:19 PM
ThomasMarik, on 29 January 2013 - 01:01 PM, said:
edit- opps, actually does it?, and Narc?
Dang I forgot, been so long since I could fire LRMs lol
Edited by Slater01, 29 January 2013 - 03:24 PM.
#131
Posted 29 January 2013 - 03:22 PM
Quote
The buff towards PPC will make lone ECM mechs even further vulnerable; nothing new here. As single ECM mechs have always been vulnerable and easy prey. A group of ECM mechs will not be affected due to stacking ECM.
Quote
The sensor buffs are too little and unnecessary. The very nature of modules being weightless means that anyone can carry them without much sacrifice (other than missing out on other modules). This means that anyone can mount the module for the radar boost, thus ECM mechs will continue to have radar superiority over non ECM mechs. See image below:

* By default ECM mechs have 600m radar advantage over non ECM mechs. The additional modules simply agitate the issue.
Paul said there would be possibly be small changes towards ECM. In the end there were no changes to ECM itself. Only buffs to previous techs. For the cost and weight, ECM will continue to be the hot ticket item. In anticipation of facing ECM, players will be coerced in equipping:
- TAG: if it wasn't for ECM this wouldn't even be used. Instead buff TAG in a way to make it useful despite ECM.
- PPC: We were promised EMP properties, which means it should be affecting several, if not all, electronics. Instead, it appears PPC will only become a full time ECM counter.
- Sensor modules: The whole module system works a lot like perks from CoD. You add some random buffs to your character, ie a bad system. 50m aren't changing anything. It is good to see that the sensor modules are now working against ECM, as was originally promised in the previous patch.
Edited by StalaggtIKE, 30 January 2013 - 07:26 AM.
#132
Posted 29 January 2013 - 03:25 PM
5th Fedcom Rat, on 29 January 2013 - 03:04 PM, said:
Sounds like a ghost story from the mouth of someone that has never played in an 8-man.
#133
Posted 29 January 2013 - 03:30 PM
More counters, more better. Why worry?
#134
Posted 29 January 2013 - 03:46 PM
StalaggtIKE, on 29 January 2013 - 03:22 PM, said:
Yeah..see...your stand is that ECM IS broken and must be rebalanced.
PGI's stand and my own as well, along with many others, is that ECM is not broken and doesn't need to be rebalanced. We've been told for a while now that PPCs would be getting an EMP effect, it's something that the weapon's supposed to do, part of what makes it so deadly, and we'd figured that it would cause ECM to fail for whowever long the EMO effect lasted. Hey, we were right!
Question is, is that EMP effect ONLY going to work vs ECM or will it be on all the electronics? Will the HUD get fuzzy, will locks be lost, and so on...that's my only question about the EMP effect.
#135
Posted 29 January 2013 - 04:01 PM
Kristov Kerensky, on 29 January 2013 - 03:46 PM, said:
Garth himself said they thought it was.
As I said before; I don't believe this is the final 'change' to ECM. PPCs were slated to get an EMP effect before Garth ever even made that comment.
#136
Posted 29 January 2013 - 04:05 PM
#137
Posted 29 January 2013 - 04:06 PM
wynce, on 29 January 2013 - 12:13 PM, said:
They are treating the symptoms as opposed to the disease.
#138
Posted 29 January 2013 - 04:08 PM
My only question is, "are we there yet?"
#140
Posted 29 January 2013 - 04:18 PM
Fat and barrel-chested, Sgt. Geoffrey Barnes settled in beside him. "Somethin' on your mind, Lieutenant?"
Dixon let out a slow sigh. "Yeah, I guess you could say that. Sarge, I know you're not a Mechwarrior, but how do I deal with an ECM-equipped opforce?"
"We fixed that issue your targeting computer was having tracking fast targets. Y'want my expert opinion? Just shoot `em," Barnes replied with a chuckle. He glanced upwards at Maxwell's stalker then did a double-take. The bulk of five LRM-20s turned the `Mech's normally sleek outline into a bulbous caricature. Barnes found his face resting squarely in the palm of his hand before he even realized he'd moved.
"Lieutenant," Barnes asked, "Y'ever considered bringin' a secondary weapon?"
"Yeah," Dixon replied. "But the Streak SRMs weren't working well so I stripped them out."
Barnes shook his head. "Y'tried any normal SRMs? They spread out more but that just means they can hit a light in the legs--and a legged `Mech is a dead `Mech. Heck, even some lasers'll help you do the job. Just lead the target a little and let `em walk right into the beam. I promise your targeting computer's fixed, you won't have the same problem hitting anything even if you can't target it. Heck, I bet we could mount a couple of ER PPCs in the arms if you're really worried. Some charged particles ought to interfere with the ECM somethin' awful."
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users