Mgs Are Still Bad!
#1
Posted 04 June 2013 - 12:09 PM
#3
Posted 04 June 2013 - 12:15 PM
MG = Terrible Weapon
#4
Posted 04 June 2013 - 12:20 PM
Ideally - double the damage and make them fire in 2.5 second bursts with 2.5 second down time, because you can't keep your lasers, other ballistics, and missile on target while firing the machineguns unless the target is sitting still, meaning - they do less DPS in a practical firefight than posted, by a long shot.
Edited by Monky, 04 June 2013 - 12:21 PM.
#5
Posted 04 June 2013 - 12:23 PM
#6
Posted 04 June 2013 - 12:57 PM
Please...
#8
Posted 04 June 2013 - 01:05 PM
a ) 4DPS with current damage profile
b ) 2 - 2.5 DPS with current damage profile minus the cone of RNG.
Edited by Esplodin, 04 June 2013 - 01:06 PM.
#9
Posted 04 June 2013 - 01:13 PM
#11
Posted 04 June 2013 - 01:39 PM
#12
Posted 04 June 2013 - 02:03 PM
The short range and horrendous spread ruin their raw damage potential.
#13
Posted 04 June 2013 - 02:28 PM
It's almost like the 1,000+ post thread on MG feedback is wilfully ignored.
That's 1,000+ posts just in that thread alone; with the 4,196 posts in the linked threads from the first post, there's been over 5,000 posts on MG feedback - most of it saying the MG's need a major buff; much bigger than the one they got last patch.
And still the MG sucks.
#14
Posted 04 June 2013 - 03:27 PM
It has yet to reach that critical mass yet.
#15
Posted 04 June 2013 - 03:41 PM
stjobe, on 04 June 2013 - 02:28 PM, said:
It's almost like the 1,000+ post thread on MG feedback is wilfully ignored.
That's 1,000+ posts just in that thread alone; with the 4,196 posts in the linked threads from the first post, there's been over 5,000 posts on MG feedback - most of it saying the MG's need a major buff; much bigger than the one they got last patch.
And still the MG sucks.
Sounds like just about every other weapon and game balance issue then.
#16
Posted 04 June 2013 - 03:56 PM
#19
Posted 04 June 2013 - 05:45 PM
5 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 5 guests, 0 anonymous users