Post #124: Solutions
original post:
If I give you a sword, a bow, and spear which you have never used either of, and I tell you to train with them...
If you say you are best with the spear...
If we go back to when you had never used them, would you still be best with the spear?
No, you have never used any of them.
Another question, would you still be best with the spear, if you tried them again?
If yes, then I believe hero mechs are pay to win.
Two gladiators enter an arena. They are presented with weapons. These weapons have been used by gladiators over and over, all have been used to win with roughly the same amount. The weapons are said to be balanced.
One gladiator is funded by a wealthy master, he gets a few more weapons. No weapon that has won more on average than any of the others.
The less fortunate gladiator has a smaller selection to choose from. The gladiator notices that one of the weapons the other has that he doesn't, is one hes trained his whole life with. One he knows like the back of his hand.
A player loads up mech warrior, he is going to buy a mech. He looks through the list. He sees a hero mech, it has a unique loadout. Unfortunately he is unable to pay the $20 for it. No matter as all the mechs are balanced, so he is at no disadvantage.
But if he had played it, he would realize it is the mech he is best at.
Is it pay to win?
Edited by Thomas Covenant, 06 June 2013 - 10:06 AM.