1251 replies to this topic

[Victor Morson]

Sybreed, on 17 September 2013 - 11:19 AM, said:

Chill with the censoring Niko

I wish admin got back to my ticket about Niko lying about the number of posters in the Apology Feedback thread demonstrably and with actual statistics, but alas.

[Top Secret Fifth Account Shhh]

Khan just crit that scrub in the face.

Nice 1 shot bro

[Vanguard319]

Wow, 90% of the negative reviews are from complete [dezgra] raging about the existence of 3pv or how "PGI lied". the few negative critics who actually give an honest review generally give it at least a 5 or so. Sry people, but reviews are supposed to be impartial, no one cares that you have a personal vendetta to see the game fail because you despise the devs.

Edited by Niko Snow, 17 September 2013 - 02:43 PM.

[Sean von Steinike]

Vanguard319, on 17 September 2013 - 02:29 PM, said:

Wow, 90% of the negative reviews are from complete shitlords raging about the existence of 3pv or how "PGI lied". the few negative critics who actually give an honest review generally give it at least a 5 or so. Sry people, but reviews are supposed to be impartial, no one cares that you have a personal vendetta to see the game fail because you despise the devs.

Why would it fail? Vocal minority don't count in this game, remember?

[Sybreed]

Victor Morson, on 17 September 2013 - 02:28 PM, said:

I wish admin got back to my ticket about Niko lying about the number of posters in the Apology Feedback thread demonstrably and with actual statistics, but alas.

If what I said in my OP was deemed not constructive by Niko, I guess Russ' entire twitter account should be censored then.

edit: this post will probably get me into trouble I kid I kid, Russ does give some interesting info from time to time. There's a lot of trolling though.

Edited by Sybreed, 17 September 2013 - 02:34 PM.

[Dr B00t]

KhanHeir, on 17 September 2013 - 02:25 PM, said:

What happens when he realizes there are more unhappy people on the island than expected? like over half the playerbase?

hehe this whole thing reminds me of "Lord of the Flies"

[Shumabot]

Vanguard319, on 17 September 2013 - 02:29 PM, said:

Wow, 90% of the negative reviews are from complete shitlords raging about the existence of 3pv or how "PGI lied". the few negative critics who actually give an honest review generally give it at least a 5 or so. Sry people, but reviews are supposed to be impartial, no one cares that you have a personal vendetta to see the game fail because you despise the devs.

A 5 is a pretty abysmal score.

[FLes]

Vanguard319, on 17 September 2013 - 02:29 PM, said:

(...)but reviews are supposed to be impartial, no one cares that you have a personal vendetta to see the game fail because you despise the devs.

Lots of things about this game were also supposed to be...

Edited by FLes, 17 September 2013 - 02:35 PM.

[Syllogy]

ERMAGERD! ... But users at Gamespot rated it 7.5!

Edited by Syllogy, 17 September 2013 - 02:39 PM.

[vrok]

Vanguard319, on 17 September 2013 - 02:29 PM, said:

Wow, 90% of the negative reviews are from complete shitlords raging about the existence of 3pv or how "PGI lied". the few negative critics who actually give an honest review generally give it at least a 5 or so. Sry people, but reviews are supposed to be impartial, no one cares that you have a personal vendetta to see the game fail because you despise the devs.

Impartial reviews? If you even think such a thing can exist, you are truly delusional.

[Sybreed]

Voivode, on 17 September 2013 - 02:23 PM, said:

HAHAHAHAHA! I just read a review that claimed there was a "Stalinist approach" to the forums that doesn't allow criticism. For real? These forums are solid whining about the game!

Well, my OP got censored because I said PGI's attitude is killing the game. Take that for what you will.

[Syllogy]

Sybreed, on 17 September 2013 - 02:39 PM, said:

Well, my OP got censored because I said PGI's attitude is killing the game. Take that for what you will.

Sky is falling?

[Shakespeare]

KhanHeir, on 17 September 2013 - 02:23 PM, said:

Hush little baby don't you squeal,
Piggys gonna make you a new grabdeal,



oh and those kinds of reviews get removed, enjoy.

You're right, I should have posted under a separate name, maybe even several! that way I could create a false sense of consensus. I guess I just don't troll enough for that to occur to me naturally.
Does it deserve a 9? ehh, probably not. brutal honest it's a 6 for me. But at 150 characters, you either justify your post, or you don't. Not sure how posting as myself is somehow worse than rabble-rousing the disgruntled to bomb the user review page. Meanwhile, somebody else posted as 'garth' with a 0/10, plus an apology for ruining the game, followed by a resignation. If you're itching to go after the dishonest and delusional, that's a good place to start - we've got far too many trolls around here. I was under the impression that those dissatisfied were going to get their refunds and GO. Instead they just find new places, under new names, to shout angrily at a community they paradoxically despise, yet continue to operate in.

Appreciate the effort, though - you always go to such lengths to discredit the people you disagree with.

Edited by Shakespeare, 17 September 2013 - 02:45 PM.

[KhanHeir]

Syllogy, on 17 September 2013 - 02:35 PM, said:

ERMAGERD! ... But users at Gamespot rated it 7.5!

Well, them and many of the apologetic golds are part of the noble " Blue Falcons ".

If they want to see where this vessel takes them, them and the business their friends get them into.

[Shumabot]

Shakespeare, on 17 September 2013 - 02:40 PM, said:

You're right, I should have posted under a separate name, maybe even several! that way I could create a false sense of consensus. I guess I just don't troll enough for that to occur to me naturally.
Does it deserve a 9? ehh, probably not. brutal honest it's a 6 for me. But at 150 characters, you either justify your post, or you don't. Not sure how posting as myself is somehow worse than rabble-rousing the disgruntled to bomb the user review page.

Appreciate the effort, though - you always go to such lengths to discredit the people you disagree with.

You mean you're NOT every 10/10 score? There are More like you? This is a worrying development for mankind.

[Dr B00t]

Syllogy, on 17 September 2013 - 02:35 PM, said:

ERMAGERD! ... But users at Gamespot rated it 7.5!

give us a link so we can fix it

[Oderint dum Metuant]

Im sure the actual critics will score it well, i mean PC gamer is a given 10 for the briefcase.

It'll right itself in the end.

[KhanHeir]

[Dr B00t]

Shakespeare, on 17 September 2013 - 02:40 PM, said:

You're right, I should have posted under a separate name, maybe even several! that way I could create a false sense of consensus. I guess I just don't troll enough for that to occur to me naturally.
Does it deserve a 9? ehh, probably not. brutal honest it's a 6 for me. But at 150 characters, you either justify your post, or you don't. Not sure how posting as myself is somehow worse than rabble-rousing the disgruntled to bomb the user review page.

Appreciate the effort, though - you always go to such lengths to discredit the people you disagree with.

considering you were discredited with your own words i think he did a pretty good job

[Jin Ma]

lots of disgruntled players making these reviews. lets see what the big reviewers say