SpiralFace, on 25 November 2013 - 03:34 PM, said:
I think Davion being associated with America has more to do with peoples view of there Militaristic background compared to America's. Not their overall state culture.
Davion is considered the most militaristic of all the Succession states with a more "western" flavor into their arm's doctrine. (Kurita and the Clans all have that foreign tinge to their militarism.) When you look at the Davion MILITARY and not its overarching culture, its easy to draw a parallel between the opportunistic Davion Military and America's Military.
I think its that outlook of their military that makes people see them more as the "america" of the IS.
But in reality, the Freeworld league is more American. The most "democratic" of the IS ruling nations, has much more of a "free market" mentality both in its military and the company's that are there.
The Clans are not so much "Russians" so much as the Mongol Hordes of Genghis Khan. They where seen as a huge, unified "marauding" force form the outside aggressively gobbling up systems as they went, and are very "warrior class" centric. *edit* In fact the word "Khan" and many other clan nomenclature was derived from the Mongol's.
Sure their founder was from Russian decent, but that doesn't mean that they all are Russian. As the descendants of a multinational army that spanned the entire Inner sphere, there people are probably the most culturally diverse of any IS nation, even if their army / leadership is mostly comprised of in-breed test tube baby's.
My take on a short generalization of each faction:
- Federated Suns/House Davion: essentially the British Empire, with some additional French and American overtones
- Lyran Commonwealth/House Steiner: essentially the Holy Roman Empire, with heavy German overtones
- Draconis Combine/House Kurita: essentially early Showa Era (roundabout WWI/WWII) Japan, with a smattering of other cultures (mainly Arabic) represented
- Capellan Confederation/House Liao: essentially Qing Dynasty Era China, with a smattering of other cultures (mainly Russian and Scottish) represented
- Free Worlds League/House Marik: essentially the Ottoman Empire, with some Indian (as in "from India" rather than "Native American") and American overtones
- Free Rasalhague Republic: essentially the Swedish Empire, with some American overtones
- The Clans (to be made available eventually) collectively represent the "great conquering hordes" and/or the "romanticized noble savages" of the past (e.g. the Mongols under Genghis Khan, the Macedonians under Alexander III, the Romans during the expansion of the Roman Empire, and so on), while each Clan individually represents a separate society - the Ghost Bears are generally thought to be Scandinavian (like the FRR, with whom they later merged) and modeled in the spirit of the (romanticized) Vikings, the Smoke Jaguars are thought to represent (stereotypes of) the warrior tribes of Africa's past (most notably the Zulu Kingdom), the Nova Cats are thought to have been modeled on (stereotypes of) Native American societies (with the Wanapum, Cheyenne, and/or Sioux likely serving as primary inspirations), and so on.
Additionally,
ComStar (along with the
Word of Blake) represents
the pop-culture rendition of the Illuminati, while the
St. Ives Compact takes the role of "Space Taiwan".
The Davion family themselves are actually of French heritage (said to be a region in southwest France called
Gascony), but the Federated Suns as a nation seems to be based on an Anglo-American model - in many ways, it is a lot like a mish-mash of the old British Empire, the current Commonwealth of Nations, and the modern United States.
IMO, it is the
Federated Commonwealth (the union of the FedSuns and the Lyran Commonwealth ) that would be more like the European Union.
The Free Worlds League government, despite its claims of being a "democracy" (where the term is often used - incorrectly - to imply that the FWL is a
republic), is really more a
constitutional monarchy or a
federal monarchy in terms of actual implementation (with the Captain-General serving as the "monarch").
Quote
A republic is a form of government in which affairs of state are a "public matter" (Latin: res publica), not the private concern of the rulers, in which public offices are consequently appointed or elected rather than privately accommodated (i.e., through inheritance or divine mandate). In modern times, the common definition of a republic is a government which excludes a monarch.
Quote
Constitutional monarchy is a form of government in which a monarch acts as head of state within the guidelines of a constitution, whether it be a written, uncodified, or blended constitution. This form of government differs from absolute monarchy in which an absolute monarch serves as the source of power in the state and is not legally bound by any constitution and has the powers to regulate his or her respective government.
-----
Most constitutional monarchies employ a parliamentary system in which the monarch may have strictly ceremonial duties or may have reserve powers, depending on the constitution. Under most modern constitutional monarchies there is also a prime minister who is the head of government and exercises effective political power. There also exist today several federal constitutional monarchies. In these countries, each subdivision has a distinct government and head of government, but all subdivisions share a monarch who is head of state of the federation as a united whole.
Quote
A federal monarchy is a federation of states with a single monarch as over-all head of the federation, but retaining different monarchs, or a non-monarchical system of government, in the various states joined to the federation.
Edited by Strum Wealh, 25 November 2013 - 04:41 PM.