Edited by Zerberus, 07 June 2014 - 03:15 AM.
The Clans And What We Know So Far
#41
Posted 07 June 2014 - 03:14 AM
#42
Posted 07 June 2014 - 03:23 AM
#43
Posted 07 June 2014 - 04:39 AM
#44
Posted 07 June 2014 - 05:02 AM
Very bad.
From MW2 to MW4 this was possible, paying more money.
There are IS mechs still not sold because waiting for Clan Upgrade.
Now lot of players have to sell IS Mechs because they are always
weaker than Clan Omnis.
Who will still use an IS Orion against a Clan Mad Cat?,
A Cathapract against a Loki?
The only one i don't want to sell is my ECM StealthRaven.
This is a big mistake - probably for earning more money.
We will see.
Edited by Anavel Gato2, 07 June 2014 - 05:06 AM.
#45
Posted 07 June 2014 - 05:11 AM
Anavel Gato2, on 07 June 2014 - 05:02 AM, said:
Very bad.
From MW2 to MW4 this was possible, paying more money.
There are IS mechs still not sold because waiting for Clan Upgrade.
Now lot of players have to sell IS Mechs because they are always
weaker than Clan Omnis.
Who will still use an IS Orion against a Clan Mad Cat?,
A Cathapract against a Loki?
This is a big mistake - probably for earning more money.
We will see.
It appears you completely missed (or dismissed /ignored) the last 6 months of discussion regarding, above all else, the balancing of Clans vs IS.
Not saying it will be perfect out of the gate, but your wishful thinking mixtech scenario is wholly unnecessary (and also not canon until at least 3053, when the invasion is already over and the DCMS have finally reverse engineered caputred omni-tech), and your doomsaying of the IS mechs is for the most part unfounded.
I`m not going to post any links for you becauee you`ve been here long enough to find the Command chair, Vlogs and announcement forums by yourself. It is nobody`s fault but yours that you do not already have this information.
MW2 - 4 also took place at entirely different points among the BT timeline to MWO, and are just as "officially Not Canon" as MWO is, so referencing them as "it used to always be this way " is an entirely wasted set of keystrokes for 3 good reasons: DIfferent point in timeline (where mixtech WAS canon), themselves not canon (invalidates it as a reference), and MWO isn`t canon either (frees MWO from that restriction even if mixtech WERE canon).
Not to mention that those were all single player games with a halfassed afterthought of a multiplayer mode (if any), rife with absolutely stupid imbalances in MP. Not a full blown multiplayer game where both sides are supposed to have fun AND a fighting chance, whether they use PPCs and Jumpjets or not.
Edited by Zerberus, 07 June 2014 - 08:03 AM.
#46
Posted 07 June 2014 - 06:45 AM
Scurry, on 07 June 2014 - 02:39 AM, said:
Artemis is equipment tangible by either group. There would be no reason not to have a Clan Artemis functionality. In TT it functions exactly the same -- which isn't remotely like how it functions in MWO. But one can assume it will have exactly the same results as MWO's Inner Sphere Artemis. It's identical for both teams. The only difference is Clan Artemis is lighter.
#47
Posted 07 June 2014 - 06:50 AM
Anavel Gato2, on 07 June 2014 - 05:02 AM, said:
Very bad.
From MW2 to MW4 this was possible, paying more money.
Would you ever use Inner Sphere tech if you can equip Clan tech on Inner Sphere mechs?
No one would.
That's why it was done. This and to note: In MW2, you ARE Clans. In MW3, Clan Smoke Jaguar is almost completely annihilated; meaning the war has gone on for years and years. In MW4, it's long after the invasion and Clanners and Inner Sphere soldiers are getting drunk in bars together talking about tournaments. Basically most of the war stuff is over.
We're at the beginning of the war. Why would we have the Clan tech? At this stage, 95% of Inner Sphere mechs are supposed to be on Standard Structure, Standard Armor, Standard Engines, and Standard Heatsinks. Only 5% of the forces in the Inner Sphere across all of the factions would have had double heatsinks at this stage.
Look how many people have DHS. Endo Steel. XL engines. Etc.
Bit of a problem isn't it? Give people the best, they will have the best.
The only way to prevent abuse is to not let it happen.
#48
Posted 07 June 2014 - 07:29 AM
#51
Posted 07 June 2014 - 08:52 AM
<.<
Answers a lot of questions I've had about the Clan equipment.
#52
Posted 07 June 2014 - 08:52 AM
Koniving, on 07 June 2014 - 08:38 AM, said:
I'm pretty sure a Summoner can carry twin UAC/20s. A Timberwolf can't. At all. (No body parts with enough free crit space).
With 22.5 tons of weapons available and a UAC-20 weighing in at 12 tons each without ammo, I'd say no chance at all.
At 10 tons each, it can't even carry 2xUAC-10's if it wants to bring any ammo.
Edited by Moenrg, 07 June 2014 - 08:54 AM.
#53
Posted 07 June 2014 - 10:28 AM
Scurry, on 07 June 2014 - 02:39 AM, said:
Now that you mention it, there has not been. They could go a few routes for that yet, either fixed or upgradeable regardless, possibly on a per chassis variant basis. The one thing I wonder about is how it will narrow spread with stream fire LRMs. I'm sure the rest will be the same as we have now but as mentioned, lighter weight.
Anavel Gato2, on 07 June 2014 - 05:02 AM, said:
Very bad.
From MW2 to MW4 this was possible, paying more money.
There are IS mechs still not sold because waiting for Clan Upgrade.
Now lot of players have to sell IS Mechs because they are always
weaker than Clan Omnis.
Who will still use an IS Orion against a Clan Mad Cat?,
A Cathapract against a Loki?
The only one i don't want to sell is my ECM StealthRaven.
This is a big mistake - probably for earning more money.
We will see.
You have read my original post, quiaff? Then you should know the balancing factors they are putting in place. Clan tech will be different but equal to IS tech, if all goes to plan. The devs are specifically trying to avoid invalidating older chassis and IS tech.
JennerCrusher, on 07 June 2014 - 05:47 AM, said:
Hmm, that is what I get for being lazy and using Shar Wolf's list. *Shar Wolf, bus, tossed.* I will go in and edit it, thanks for pointing it out.
SgtMagor, on 07 June 2014 - 07:29 AM, said:
True, but it does have heavy hitting weapons and a lot of range. It has over double the armour of a kit fox and the LRMs are still usable under 180m, at reduced damage. The B variant can load 5x SSRM6 and would dice, slice, and julian the poor thing. Then there's the D variant, the one I have my eyes on. 2x energy in each arm, 1x ballistic in each torso, 2xAMS, and if it does anything of note, a targeting computer. I have been tweaking and 4x ERML, 2xUAC2(4xammo), 2xAMS(2xammo), drop TC, add 1 DHS is possible. Or, with an omni-pod from the B, drop the UAC2s and go for a UAC5(2-3xammo) and an LRM10 (2-3x ammo).... I should note these builds are assuming we can not add or subtract total armour.
The prime though... we will have to see what they give it for quirks. They mentioned reducing weapon cooldown times and modifying heat generation/loss. So who knows, they might make that 1x energy slot fire twice as fast and cool the weapon mounted there by double as well. That wouldn't look so bad then. Will have to see what they do for quirks though, they have not given us anything solid.
#55
Posted 07 June 2014 - 10:41 AM
So, we'll have that 'ghost AC' on the mech, and likely be able to swap the LBX and Std AC like we currently toggle ECM from counter to active, the big issue then ends up being that we have to carry separate loads of ammo for scatter/slug, whereas, if I recall correctly, it used to simply be LBx ammo, and the ammo itself split or held together as the pilot chose.
So, we'll see a Left Arm mounted LBx, and in the same exact slot (likely grayed out), a regular AC. And somewhere on the mech, you're going to have to put slug ammo, AND LBx ammo.
Of course, I could be wrong, it's happened before, but this is how it's likely to work from how I've been reading it.
#56
Posted 07 June 2014 - 10:43 AM
Shar Wolf, on 07 June 2014 - 10:36 AM, said:
lol true enough. I do not know what you did with the bold and underline codes but for some reason it keeps negating the underline on the last few, even if I edit the thing and redo them all. I blame the forum on that one. Could be my wanton use of "[ ]" for additions too. Oh well, thanks for the list anyway, saved me from doing it hahaha
Mercer Skye, on 07 June 2014 - 10:41 AM, said:
So, we'll have that 'ghost AC' on the mech, and likely be able to swap the LBX and Std AC like we currently toggle ECM from counter to active, the big issue then ends up being that we have to carry separate loads of ammo for scatter/slug, whereas, if I recall correctly, it used to simply be LBx ammo, and the ammo itself split or held together as the pilot chose.
So, we'll see a Left Arm mounted LBx, and in the same exact slot (likely grayed out), a regular AC. And somewhere on the mech, you're going to have to put slug ammo, AND LBx ammo.
Of course, I could be wrong, it's happened before, but this is how it's likely to work from how I've been reading it.
Nope, already confirmed by Paul (I linked the twitter post in the OP and in this thread), we get 3 different types of ACs for Clans. They can not get alternate fire in any form to work.
2 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users