20517 replies to this topic

[slimebucket]

http://www.sarna.net/wiki/Uziel

Uziel is my bet for next mech

[Budor]

I NEED MOAR ROBIT ART NAO!

[Silentium]

Yeah, their art is top notch, but I keep seeing that atlas on the background and feel the need to make a meme.

[Jack Gallows]

slimebucket, on 02 March 2013 - 05:02 AM, said:

http://www.sarna.net/wiki/Uziel

Uziel is my bet for next mech

I'm a betting man, and I bet you're wrong. Which, isn't really a bet as the Uziel doesn't hit the scene till around 3065ish. No Uziel.

But, let's see either



or

Edited by Jack Gallows, 02 March 2013 - 05:29 AM.

[Thirdstar]

Jack Gallows, on 02 March 2013 - 05:28 AM, said:

But, let's see either

The Art really doesn't do the Cyclops any favours.

[Jack Gallows]

Thirdstar, on 02 March 2013 - 05:57 AM, said:

The Art really doesn't do the Cyclops any favours.

Considering Flying Debris is going to put his own spin on it like many of the previous 'mechs, doesn't matter much. He's taken some ugly 'mechs and made them look stellar.

[Thirdstar]

Jack Gallows, on 02 March 2013 - 06:00 AM, said:

Considering Flying Debris is going to put his own spin on it like many of the previous 'mechs, doesn't matter much. He's taken some ugly 'mechs and made them look stellar.

This is true. I'm always keen to see what FDs done to some of the undeniably ugly BT designs.

We want Mech #20!

When do we want it?

NAO!

[Hawkeye 72]

Thontor, on 02 March 2013 - 06:07 AM, said:

The Banshee looks about 10 meters tall in that picture... so tiny... at least by MWO terms...

That is because the mech you see there is a Cyclops, not a Banshee

[Hawkeye 72]

Thontor, on 02 March 2013 - 08:40 AM, said:

your right and I knew that i don't know why I said Banshee...

Still way too short for a 90 ton mech

I figured it was just a typo. You know your battletech too well.

[Josef Nader]

...Why is the Cyclops' LRM launcher angled downward?

[Merky Merc]

Josef Nader, on 02 March 2013 - 09:36 AM, said:

...Why is the Cyclops' LRM launcher angled downward?

If that is your only issue with much of that early BT art then you must not have seen much of it

[Odanan]

Josef Nader, on 02 March 2013 - 09:36 AM, said:

...Why is the Cyclops' LRM launcher angled downward?

Crappy art.

Adridos, on 02 March 2013 - 03:38 AM, said:

Like I could actually take THIS! as a Shadow Hawk.

The Cobra Commander is one of the ugliest Reseens.

verybad, on 01 March 2013 - 09:42 AM, said:

Spore was so depressing. I thought it was going to be a serious thoughtful evolution game. Instead is was a lazy blob of $#!7. The design thing was kind of cool though. Just such a missed opportunity.

Indeed. It could be one of the greatest video games ever, but it turned up to several watered down mini-games bundled together.

slimebucket, on 02 March 2013 - 05:02 AM, said:

http://www.sarna.net/wiki/Uziel

Uziel is my bet for next mech

Welcome to the forums, MW4 player. Please read this before breathing again.

[Stone Profit]

Jack Gallows, on 02 March 2013 - 05:28 AM, said:

I'm a betting man, and I bet you're wrong. Which, isn't really a bet as the Uziel doesn't hit the scene till around 3065ish. No Uziel.

But, let's see either



or

The Hatamoto Kaeru? With torpedos and such? Perhaps the chi instead.

[Lonestar1771]

I actually wouldn't be surprised if they did make the Cyclops mech #20 considering their propensity to cram ECM down our throats.

[verybad]

I would so love to have a Hatamoto in the game. Would also make it easy for them to add a Charger later as they're based on the same chassis and could use the same animation and some of the same modeling. The "Hat" has a ton of good variants too. Lots of variety on that mech.

Edited by verybad, 02 March 2013 - 01:39 PM.

[Adridos]

Jack Gallows, on 02 March 2013 - 05:28 AM, said:

But, let's see either.

You could've been a bit fairer than to compare TRO:3025 (nostalgic, but horrible and ugly) art with XTRO one...

Something like this:


VS

[AceTimberwolf]

Adridos, on 02 March 2013 - 01:53 PM, said:

You could've been a bit fairer than to compare TRO:3025 (nostalgic, but horrible and ugly) art with XTRO one...

Something like this:


VS

I'll take the Hata-chi with the Twin SRM 6s vs the Cyclops. It be hard to get a nice looking cyclops without it looking like a Heavy Gear as thats where i think it would land based on its build

[Strum Wealh]

Lonestar1771, on 02 March 2013 - 01:33 PM, said:

I actually wouldn't be surprised if they did make the Cyclops mech #20 considering their propensity to cram ECM down our throats.

Ironically, none of the canon Cyclops variants mounts an ECM suite.

In fact, the Cyclops is generally known for equipment like Command Consoles (mounted by the CP-10-Z-DC and CP-11-A-DC variants) and Collapsible Command Modules (mounted by the CP-10-HQ variant) - both of which canonically provide ECCM/Counter-ECM capabilities.

Edited by Strum Wealh, 02 March 2013 - 02:28 PM.

[Lonestar1771]

Strum Wealh, on 02 March 2013 - 02:13 PM, said:

Ironically, none of the canon Cyclops variants mounts an ECM suite.

In fact, the Cyclops is generally known for equipment like Command Consoles (mounted by the CP-10-D-DC and CP-11-A-DC variants) and Collapsible Command Modules (mounted by the CP-10-HQ variant) - both of which canonically provide ECCM/Counter-ECM capabilities.

Lol, I stand corrected and happy because that's one less reason to have another mini-atlas.

[Adridos]

Strum Wealh, on 02 March 2013 - 02:13 PM, said:

Ironically, none of the canon Cyclops variants mounts an ECM suite.

ECM is only used in Confederation. Other houses simply lack the tech and usage for it... at least at this time.

And as far as our own Cyclopses are concerned, CCAF is small enough never to need more than the RVN-3L to cover us.

Edited by Adridos, 02 March 2013 - 02:34 PM.