#2621
Posted 02 March 2013 - 03:50 AM
#2623
Posted 02 March 2013 - 05:04 AM
#2624
Posted 02 March 2013 - 05:20 AM
#2625
#2627
Posted 02 March 2013 - 06:00 AM
Thirdstar, on 02 March 2013 - 05:57 AM, said:
The Art really doesn't do the Cyclops any favours.
Considering Flying Debris is going to put his own spin on it like many of the previous 'mechs, doesn't matter much. He's taken some ugly 'mechs and made them look stellar.
#2628
Posted 02 March 2013 - 06:07 AM
Jack Gallows, on 02 March 2013 - 06:00 AM, said:
Considering Flying Debris is going to put his own spin on it like many of the previous 'mechs, doesn't matter much. He's taken some ugly 'mechs and made them look stellar.
This is true. I'm always keen to see what FDs done to some of the undeniably ugly BT designs.
We want Mech #20!
When do we want it?
NAO!
#2631
Posted 02 March 2013 - 09:36 AM
#2633
Posted 02 March 2013 - 09:53 AM
Josef Nader, on 02 March 2013 - 09:36 AM, said:
Crappy art.
Adridos, on 02 March 2013 - 03:38 AM, said:
The Cobra Commander is one of the ugliest Reseens.
verybad, on 01 March 2013 - 09:42 AM, said:
Indeed. It could be one of the greatest video games ever, but it turned up to several watered down mini-games bundled together.
slimebucket, on 02 March 2013 - 05:02 AM, said:
Welcome to the forums, MW4 player. Please read this before breathing again.
#2634
Posted 02 March 2013 - 10:24 AM
Jack Gallows, on 02 March 2013 - 05:28 AM, said:
I'm a betting man, and I bet you're wrong. Which, isn't really a bet as the Uziel doesn't hit the scene till around 3065ish. No Uziel.
But, let's see either
or
The Hatamoto Kaeru? With torpedos and such? Perhaps the chi instead.
#2635
Posted 02 March 2013 - 01:33 PM
#2636
Posted 02 March 2013 - 01:39 PM
Edited by verybad, 02 March 2013 - 01:39 PM.
#2638
Posted 02 March 2013 - 01:58 PM
Adridos, on 02 March 2013 - 01:53 PM, said:
Something like this:
VS
I'll take the Hata-chi with the Twin SRM 6s vs the Cyclops. It be hard to get a nice looking cyclops without it looking like a Heavy Gear as thats where i think it would land based on its build
#2639
Posted 02 March 2013 - 02:13 PM
Lonestar1771, on 02 March 2013 - 01:33 PM, said:
Ironically, none of the canon Cyclops variants mounts an ECM suite.
In fact, the Cyclops is generally known for equipment like Command Consoles (mounted by the CP-10-Z-DC and CP-11-A-DC variants) and Collapsible Command Modules (mounted by the CP-10-HQ variant) - both of which canonically provide ECCM/Counter-ECM capabilities.
Edited by Strum Wealh, 02 March 2013 - 02:28 PM.
#2640
Posted 02 March 2013 - 02:18 PM
Strum Wealh, on 02 March 2013 - 02:13 PM, said:
In fact, the Cyclops is generally known for equipment like Command Consoles (mounted by the CP-10-D-DC and CP-11-A-DC variants) and Collapsible Command Modules (mounted by the CP-10-HQ variant) - both of which canonically provide ECCM/Counter-ECM capabilities.
Lol, I stand corrected and happy because that's one less reason to have another mini-atlas.
17 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 17 guests, 0 anonymous users