238 replies to this topic

[Vassago Rain]

Scratch two off the untainted list. Cicada and awesome are next.

Edited by Vassago Rain, 17 March 2015 - 02:40 PM.

[Walluh]

Please stop doing this, PGI.

It's not worth it, whatsoever.

[Dymlos2003]

Meanwhile no one really cares.

[InspectorG]

Vassago Rain, on 17 March 2015 - 02:39 PM, said:

Scratch two off the untainted list. Cicada and awesome are next.

What did the Cicada ever do? Better not be touching my ride !

[Redshirt enraged]

Well...congratulations...visual appearance of Jagermech and Catapharact successfully destroyed.

[Gierling]

Are they doing this to get people to buy new mechs by ruining their old ones?

[Vassago Rain]

What a beautiful creature.

[Tennex]

Vassago Rain, on 17 March 2015 - 03:00 PM, said:

What a beautiful creature.

That would have looked awesome if the AC5s were not tiny

[Charronn]

Lol if you want us to be spearchuckers the arms are fine.......I thought this was mechwarrior online not chuckspears online.Seriously scale the ac's up,they look daft.

[Bishop Steiner]

Tennex, on 17 March 2015 - 03:00 PM, said:

That would have looked awesome if the AC5s were not tiny

needs UACs.


Also, gotta say, I do dig the sensor probe/doohickey on the Phracts left abdomen.

[Mauller]

I'm terrified what'll happen to the Mauler when they release it. Please don't neuter my Mauler!

[Lead Sponge]

I'm pretty disappointed in this too.

stjobe, on 17 March 2015 - 11:36 AM, said:

FFS, PGI.

Stop destroying the beautiful 'mechs with your ridiculously bad lego-style "dynamic geometry"!

I just had a look at my Firebrand (2xAC/5, 2xLL) - it looks like an AMPUTEE!

LOOK AT IT!



Bloody hell, this was the concept art:

[MATRAKA14]

[DocBach]

these new models look pretty terrible.

[stjobe]

I'll just leave this here, I'm sure you recognize where I got it from:

[MATRAKA14]

I have spotted all the differences!

P.D. also those centurion missiles.

[Ace Selin]

Jager does look pretty bad now.

[MoonUnitBeta]

as per Russ:

Quote

Colin ‏@scaleofthought 1h1 hour ago
@russ_bullock I hope you can see “bad” feedback as good feedback... I have to say… the jagermechs weapons don’t look good at all Sorry!
0 retweets 0 favorites

Russ Bullock ‏@russ_bullock 1h1 hour ago
@scaleofthought I do agree - just don't need insults or insinuations and put downs
0 retweets 0 favorites

Colin ‏@scaleofthought 52m52 minutes ago
@russ_bullock Of course. Never good in any situation when that happens! Thanks for listening!

Russ Bullock ‏@russ_bullock
@scaleofthought I am talking to the art department to figure it out for the out lying situations

https://twitter.com/...964646650400768

Edited by MoonUnitBeta, 17 March 2015 - 03:43 PM.

[Tennex]

MATRAKA14, on 17 March 2015 - 03:35 PM, said:

I have spotted all the differences!

P.D. also those centurion missiles.

Damn that is like a mural of sadness

(dont forget the cataphract)

[Reitrix]

Anybody remember the Wangs AC20 model being way too small when the art pass happened, and they quickly upscaled it?

Did no one consider that something similar may have happened here? Especially given that the fat AC20 barrels look great IMO.
It looks bad for the ACs to be that small, i can't believe anybody looked at that and said "Guys that looks GREAT!"
Its possible some bug entered the code between testing and the live patch.

You guys really need to stop throwing tantrums and be rational lol