

Most Wanted Features!
#1521
Posted 14 April 2024 - 10:29 AM
Please just make the Clan-PAC8 a single round instead of two...
#1522
Posted 08 May 2024 - 04:38 PM
Jihad Era Mechs:
While I'm grateful we have finally have IS OmniMechs, we should update the roster to show how far we are at. While I know that this game has thrown the eras write out the window, we should still have mechs that go along with the new era of the weapons we have. Give us updated mechs like the: Jupiter, Targe, Tundra Wolf, etc. The only chassis we have go up to the Civil War Era, so we need some new updated era mechs.
New Weapons and Equipment:
I'm also incredibly thankful that we got new weapons, but I hope we can get more like the Multi-Missile Launchers, Variable Speed Pulse Lasers, PPC Capacitors and Arrow IV's. As for equipment, it would be nice to have some Partial Wings, Reflective Armor and Hardened Armor on some mechs.
Faction Play:
New Factions
IS: The Word of Blake, The Republic of the Sphere, The Periphery Factions - Magistracy of Canopus (As an ally to the Capellan Confederation), Taurian Concordat (As an ally to the Capellan Confederation), Marian Hegemony
Clan: Clan Hell's Horses, Clan Snow Raven (as an ally to Clan Ghost Bear)
- A Faction Play where factions actually matter instead of being glorified game and forum icons. There's nothing wrong with loving your faction, but give us lore-based rivalries. Faction variants and mechs that give loyalist players a Loyalty Boost both in Quick Play and Faction Play.
- Planets updated with new information for Faction Play. Use Sarna, it exist for a reason. MW5 also added planet data from Sarna for their game, so do that for MWO.
- Update the map from the Clan Invasion of (3050) to the late stages of the Jihad Era (3080)
Edited by Will9761, 09 May 2024 - 12:46 AM.
#1523
Posted 09 May 2024 - 07:17 AM
ESC 907, on 14 April 2024 - 10:29 AM, said:
Please just make the Clan-PAC8 a single round instead of two...
Edited by KursedVixen, 10 May 2024 - 08:31 AM.
#1524
Posted 09 May 2024 - 08:09 AM
Will9761, on 08 May 2024 - 04:38 PM, said:
Jihad Era Mechs:
While I'm grateful we have finally have IS OmniMechs, we should update the roster to show how far we are at. While I know that this game has thrown the eras write out the window, we should still have mechs that go along with the new era of the weapons we have. Give us updated mechs like the: Jupiter, Targe, Tundra Wolf, etc. The only chassis we have go up to the Civil War Era, so we need some new updated era mechs.
New Weapons and Equipment:
I'm also incredibly thankful that we got new weapons, but I hope we can get more like the Multi-Missile Launchers, Variable Speed Pulse Lasers, PPC Capacitors and Arrow IV's. As for equipment, it would be nice to have some Partial Wings, Reflective Armor and Hardened Armor on some mechs.
Faction Play:
New Factions
IS: The Word of Blake, The Republic of the Sphere, The Periphery Factions - Magistracy of Canopus (As an ally to the Capellan Confederation), Taurian Concordat (As an ally to the Capellan Confederation), Marian Hegemony
Clan: Clan Hell's Horses, Clan Snow Raven (as an ally to Clan Ghost Bear)
- A Faction Play where factions actually matter instead of being glorified game and forum icons. There's nothing wrong with loving your faction, but give us lore-based rivalries. Faction variants and mechs that give loyalist players a Loyalty Boost both in Quick Play and Faction Play.
- Planets updated with new information for Faction Play. Use Sarna, it exist for a reason. MW5 also added planet data from Sarna for their game, so do that for MWO.
- Update the map from the Clan Invasion of (3050) to the late stages of the Jihad Era (3080)
#1525
Posted 09 May 2024 - 09:43 AM
KursedVixen, on 09 May 2024 - 08:09 AM, said:
I assume that you meant Multi Missile Launchers since VSP Lasers don't carry ammo? If so then, MML's can be done in MWO.
After all, take a look at how PGI did Clan ATMs. In lore, you could swap between: Regular, Inferno and Explosive Rounds, but because of the limitations in MWO, PGI made them to where the closer you are the more damage they can do and the further you are, the less damage you do. As with the MML, I know that you can only swap between short range and long range missiles. So really in MWO, MMLs can be done, they will just function like the MWO ATMs.
#1526
Posted 09 May 2024 - 10:09 AM
Will9761, on 09 May 2024 - 09:43 AM, said:
After all, take a look at how PGI did Clan ATMs. In lore, you could swap between: Regular, Inferno and Explosive Rounds, but because of the limitations in MWO, PGI made them to where the closer you are the more damage they can do and the further you are, the less damage you do. As with the MML, I know that you can only swap between short range and long range missiles. So really in MWO, MMLs can be done, they will just function like the MWO ATMs.
Improved atm had inferno ammo but that cannot be used by ATM only iATM
MMLS as far as i know are inferior, and i'm refering to changing anything with the varible speed pulse laser as there is no way to change the speed on the fly.....which would be similar to ammo swapping.
Edited by KursedVixen, 09 May 2024 - 10:12 AM.
#1527
Posted 09 May 2024 - 11:32 AM
KursedVixen, on 09 May 2024 - 10:09 AM, said:
Improved atm had inferno ammo but that cannot be used by ATM only iATM
MMLS as far as i know are inferior, and i'm refering to changing anything with the varible speed pulse laser as there is no way to change the speed on the fly.....which would be similar to ammo swapping.
I meant Extended Range, I got my ammunition types mixed up, lol. Still, if they cannot do a weapon change, PGI can either do two things to the VSP Lasers: 1. Turn them into Laser versions of Rotary ACs or 2. Turn them into Laser machine guns.
#1528
Posted 10 May 2024 - 08:32 AM
Will9761, on 09 May 2024 - 11:32 AM, said:
#1529
Posted 10 May 2024 - 08:52 AM
KursedVixen, on 10 May 2024 - 08:32 AM, said:
The way how I could see them would be more akin to Mechwarrior 2, Mechwarrior 4, or MechAssault's Pulse lasers, where instead of acting like a long beam, they resemble laser bullets visually.
Something like this:
#1530
Posted 10 May 2024 - 02:52 PM
Will9761, on 10 May 2024 - 08:52 AM, said:
Something like this:
#1532
Posted 20 May 2024 - 11:45 AM
As the gif shows below, here is how it would go:
1. You upload a Decal as a png or jpeg by clicking the box or dragging the image to the box.
2. You type in the name of your unit and it's abbreviation.
3. As your unit decal is waiting for approval, it will take the MC you have.
4. If it is approved (with good faith) the decal will be yours for your comp unit.
5. If the decal is disapproved (with good faith) for example, someone already has that unit name or is having a similar logo, you will get a refund and are allowed to try again.
6. However, if you are using a decal for hateful imagery, to take shots at PGI (bad faith), then you will lose your MC and will have to try again. Because why should bad behavior be rewarded?

Either that, or make a thread titled "MWO Comp Unit Decals" for people who want to have a unit logo for their comp teams. I don't mind the I idea of earning your unit decals, but if we wanna pay for it instead, let us.
Edited by Will9761, 20 May 2024 - 11:47 AM.
#1533
Posted 03 June 2024 - 02:10 PM
Edited by CStarker, 03 April 2025 - 12:32 PM.
#1534
Posted 05 June 2024 - 04:39 AM
#1537
Posted 08 June 2024 - 07:22 AM
#1538
Posted 08 June 2024 - 01:29 PM
#1539
Posted 08 June 2024 - 10:57 PM
HardDrive, on 08 June 2024 - 01:29 PM, said:
I have never understood why they removed the original Polar Highlands map and the Terra Therma map with two levels. Or the second version of the Caustic Valley map. Or the original HPG Manifold.
I would say that it is better to have more maps to choose from.
Let the players decide which map they would like to play on. This is what the voting system is for.
#1540
Posted 10 June 2024 - 05:07 AM
martian, on 08 June 2024 - 10:57 PM, said:
I would say that it is better to have more maps to choose from.
Let the players decide which map they would like to play on. This is what the voting system is for.
I absolutely 100% agree with this statement!
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users