Jump to content

I Don't Like This Hero-Exclusive Ecm Stuff.


284 replies to this topic

#101 Dimento Graven

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Guillotine
  • Guillotine
  • 6,208 posts

Posted 17 December 2015 - 12:56 PM

View PostBishop Steiner, on 17 December 2015 - 12:50 PM, said:

sci fi in general seems to attract people who are better with ideas and imagination than writing and understanding how to be socially engaging. So a lot of "pulp" writing, but often still fun. I'd label most of Battletech novels as such.

What blows my mind is how universally owful the White Wolf "World of Darkness" novels were, or pretty much any Warhammer literature. (or how 90% of D&D books not part of the Dragonlance Chronicles or Dragonlance Legends were just.... kind of bad..but usually still readable. Greenwood and Gygax taking the forefront of monty hall adventures...)
I have to admit, there's nothing I would argue with in any of these statements.

#102 Barantor

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Elite Founder
  • Elite Founder
  • 2,592 posts
  • LocationLexington, KY USA

Posted 17 December 2015 - 01:35 PM

The Tempest is also the mech with the most amount of energy and the least amount of missile slots.

If the fear it is going to be invisibly launching LRMs (laughable as that is) then it will be limited to two launchers.

If the fear is it is going to do something the others dont, the only thing it can do is add two more medium pulse and be some sort of weird Medium Pulse boat, which you could probably do on the Jester too, but it wouldn't be done as well as a Thunderbolt, even with ECM.

We have already had an ECM hero and we have tons of c-bill ECM mechs in all IS weight classes now so I don't see a problem.

#103 CDLord HHGD

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 9,190 posts
  • Location"You're not comp if you're not stock."

Posted 17 December 2015 - 01:37 PM

It is a thin line but ECM is no longer the "I WIN" button it was back in closed beta. Remember those Ravens?? One good thing to come about is not only the proliferation and subsequent nerfing of ECM, but also the development and proliferation of ways to counter it.

#104 Pjwned

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Little Helper
  • 4,731 posts
  • LocationDancing on the grave of Energy Draw LOL

Posted 17 December 2015 - 01:37 PM

How about we just properly fix ECM instead of it being a jesus box?

Guess that makes too much sense.

#105 Gas Guzzler

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Big Daddy
  • Big Daddy
  • 14,274 posts
  • LocationCalifornia Central Coast

Posted 17 December 2015 - 01:43 PM

View PostPjwned, on 17 December 2015 - 01:37 PM, said:

How about we just properly fix ECM instead of it being a jesus box?

Guess that makes too much sense.


That is the long term solution.

The short term solution is to get over it.

#106 TWIAFU

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Pest
  • The Pest
  • 4,011 posts
  • LocationBell's Brewery, MI

Posted 17 December 2015 - 02:18 PM

View PostBishop Steiner, on 17 December 2015 - 12:50 PM, said:

sci fi in general seems to attract people who are better with ideas and imagination than writing and understanding how to be socially engaging. So a lot of "pulp" writing, but often still fun. I'd label most of Battletech novels as such.

What blows my mind is how universally owful the White Wolf "World of Darkness" novels were, or pretty much any Warhammer literature. (or how 90% of D&D books not part of the Dragonlance Chronicles or Dragonlance Legends were just.... kind of bad..but usually still readable. Greenwood and Gygax taking the forefront of monty hall adventures...)


I still re-read Gygax's Gord the Rogue series.

#107 Bishop Steiner

    ForumWarrior

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Hammer
  • The Hammer
  • 47,187 posts
  • Locationclimbing Mt Tryhard, one smoldering Meta-Mech corpse at a time

Posted 17 December 2015 - 02:42 PM

View PostTWIAFU, on 17 December 2015 - 02:18 PM, said:


I still re-read Gygax's Gord the Rogue series.

first 2 books were OK, actually liked the first one... but the rest? UGH. Of course, the whole point o fold D&D was to become a demigod...but too monty hall to be interesting. The Beggar stuff in the first one was pretty good though.

#108 Wales Grey

    Dark Clown

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 861 posts
  • Facebook: Link
  • Twitter: Link
  • Twitch: Link
  • LocationThe Frigid North

Posted 17 December 2015 - 03:13 PM

View PostGas Guzzler, on 17 December 2015 - 12:00 PM, said:


Thanks for naming two mechs that are completely irrelevant at competitive play to show us how rampant the P2W trend is in MWO.


"Competitive" is not a word that belongs in the same sentence as "MWO", unless directly preceded by a negation such as "not". Or you're describing the general game being player versus player; I'm assuming you're using it in the sense of "DOTA/CS/Smash/MLG is competitive".

#109 Tombstoner

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bridesmaid
  • Bridesmaid
  • 2,193 posts

Posted 17 December 2015 - 03:41 PM

View PostProsperity Park, on 16 December 2015 - 03:56 PM, said:

I don't like how we have more Mechs coming out where the Hero is the only version that has ECM. I think many of us will agree that ECM is still worth more than 1.5 tons, so giving only the Heo Mech ECM without assigning any significant drawbacks makes me unsettled.

I think that Mech chassis that offer an ECM Hero should also offer a ECM Standard Variant. So, instead of just the Archer Tempest getting ECM, one of the standard variants should also get ECM.

Do others feel this way, too?

its not pay to win... its pay to have a competitive advantage or early access to tech that turns the game into clubbing seals.... i' referring to clan tech... nerfed the day its available for in game cash.

#110 Viges

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Knight Errant
  • 1,119 posts

Posted 17 December 2015 - 04:17 PM

I feel like game went P2W long time ago and nothing will change that.

#111 Nightmare1

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 7,636 posts
  • Twitch: Link
  • LocationPeeking over your shoulder while eating your cookies.

Posted 17 December 2015 - 04:42 PM

View PostProsperity Park, on 16 December 2015 - 03:56 PM, said:

I don't like how we have more Mechs coming out where the Hero is the only version that has ECM. I think many of us will agree that ECM is still worth more than 1.5 tons, so giving only the Heo Mech ECM without assigning any significant drawbacks makes me unsettled.

I think that Mech chassis that offer an ECM Hero should also offer a ECM Standard Variant. So, instead of just the Archer Tempest getting ECM, one of the standard variants should also get ECM.

Do others feel this way, too?


What are you talking about? Posted Image

The MAD doesn't have an ECM Hero.
The Rifleman doesn't have an ECM Hero.
The Warhammer doesn't have an ECM Hero.
Resistance I and II didn't have ECM Heroes.
Origins IIC didn't have ECM Heroes.
The Urby pack didn't have an ECM Hero.
The Phoenix pack didn't have an ECM Hero.

The Archer is the first IS pack to have a Hero-only ECM variant, and it's actually justifiable given the Lore behind the Tempest. If you had read any of the BT novels, you'd understand about the Phantom Mech phenomenon and Morgan Kell. Since we can't have a Phantom Mech ability, ECM is the next best thing to approximate it.

Personally speaking, I find the ECM on the Tempest to be a nice, unique feature, especially for a missile Mech, and like that PGI is designing special Mech features like this based on the Lore. So please, stop making weird and ridiculous statements like this, with complaints that are totally unfounded.

Also, regarding "drawbacks," the quirks aren't even out yet, so you're automatically assuming this Mech will be overpowered without even waiting to see how it handles or what it's complete specs are. Quit jumping to conclusions and show some patience.

Good grief.

View PostViges, on 17 December 2015 - 04:17 PM, said:

I feel like game went P2W long time ago and nothing will change that.


Another inane opinion.

How on earth did it go P2W? I don't even have Premium Time right now, and nearly all the Mechs I own can be purchased for C-bills, yet I have no problem holding my own against any Hero Mech.

I suppose that some people just can't help griefing. It must be in their blood.

#112 Andi Nagasia

    Volunteer Moderator

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 5,982 posts

Posted 17 December 2015 - 04:45 PM

View PostNightmare1, on 17 December 2015 - 04:42 PM, said:

The Archer is the first IS pack to have a Hero-only ECM variant, and it's actually justifiable given the Lore behind the Tempest. If you had read any of the BT novels, you'd understand about the Phantom Mech phenomenon and Morgan Kell. Since we can't have a Phantom Mech ability, ECM is the next best thing to approximate it.

didnt we cover this already with the Pirates Bane LCT-ECM-Hero? Posted Image

#113 Dimento Graven

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Guillotine
  • Guillotine
  • 6,208 posts

Posted 17 December 2015 - 04:47 PM

View PostAndi Nagasia, on 17 December 2015 - 04:45 PM, said:

didnt we cover this already with the Pirates Bane LCT-ECM-Hero? Posted Image
LOL!

A 'mech so damned insignificant we all forgot about it!

Hahahahahahahahahaahahahahaha!

#114 AEgg

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 719 posts

Posted 17 December 2015 - 04:48 PM

View PostNightmare1, on 17 December 2015 - 04:42 PM, said:

-snip-

Another inane opinion.

How on earth did it go P2W? I don't even have Premium Time right now, and nearly all the Mechs I own can be purchased for C-bills, yet I have no problem holding my own against any Hero Mech.

I suppose that some people just can't help griefing. It must be in their blood.


This has come up dozens of times before and it's always the same answer. Some people define pay to win literally, in that if it isn't basically an insta win button it doesn't exist. Others (including myself) consider anything that's gameplay affecting (i.e. heroes) and only available for real money pay to win since you're paying for a potential advantage (no matter how insignificant).

It's just semantics.

Edited by AEgg, 17 December 2015 - 04:50 PM.


#115 DAYLEET

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 4,316 posts
  • LocationLinoleum.

Posted 17 December 2015 - 04:53 PM

View PostDimento Graven, on 17 December 2015 - 04:47 PM, said:

LOL!

A 'mech so damned insignificant we all forgot about it!

Hahahahahahahahahaahahahahaha!

While the ecm make the Pirates Bane disappear from radar, the 2 mgs makes the world disappear from the Pirates Bane. wth did they put in the powder to make those huge blinding flames for such a small gun?

Flash hider, lostech.

Edited by DAYLEET, 17 December 2015 - 04:55 PM.


#116 Nightmare1

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 7,636 posts
  • Twitch: Link
  • LocationPeeking over your shoulder while eating your cookies.

Posted 17 December 2015 - 04:55 PM

View PostAEgg, on 17 December 2015 - 04:48 PM, said:


This has come up dozens of times before and it's always the same answer. Some people define pay to win literally, in that if it isn't basically an insta win button it doesn't exist. Others (including myself) consider anything that's gameplay affecting (i.e. heroes) and only available for real money pay to win since you're paying for a potential advantage (no matter how insignificant).

It's just semantics.


That's pay for content then, or pay for booster; not pay to win.

How can you define pay to win as anything other than "Pay" to "Win?"

#117 Nightmare1

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 7,636 posts
  • Twitch: Link
  • LocationPeeking over your shoulder while eating your cookies.

Posted 17 December 2015 - 05:08 PM

View PostAndi Nagasia, on 17 December 2015 - 04:45 PM, said:

didnt we cover this already with the Pirates Bane LCT-ECM-Hero? Posted Image



*Rolls eyes*

Riiiight, because the Pirate's Bane is terribly OP. Posted Image

Sheesh, the ECM on the Pirate's Bane is about the only reason why anyone would purchase it. If you look at the Death's Knell, a comparable Light Mech, you'll notice that it doesn't have ECM.

So...let's see...you've got the Locust and the Tempest as Heroes that are the only ECM-equippable Mechs in their chassis type.

The Anasi, Ember, Oxide, and Huginn don't have Hero-only ECM variants.

Let's look at Mediums then.

Well...I'm not even going to bother listing the Mediums since none of them have Hero-only ECM variants. Funny thing about that too; the Gray Death was released at the same time as the Pirate's Bane, but it doesn't have ECM...

What about Heavies then?

Well I'll be! Sure 'nuff, Heavies, like their Medium counterparts, don't have any Hero-only ECM variants either, not even among the snazzy new Marauders and Warhammers! Huh...how 'bout that?

It must be in the Assaults then! That's where this evil must surely lie!

...But wait! It appears that the Archer is the only Assault Mech that is going to have a Hero-only ECM variant!

So, just to make sure that I understand you properly, the concern of yours and the OP's that PGI is embarking on a new, Hero-only ECM trend is based entirely on the fact that only two (mark it: TWO!) Hero Mechs, out of all the all the Heroes in the game, are Hero-only ECM variants for their chassis?

What a travesty! I hope the entire community takes up their torches and pitchforks over this because we certainly can't allow PGI to get away with such nonsense! It doesn't matter that there are only two such Mechs, or that they weren't even released consecutively to each other; their very existence is a harbinger of worse to come!

...
...
...

Seriously dude, you two are nitpicking over nothing. Get over it.

#118 Mcgral18

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • CS 2019 Top 8 Qualifier
  • CS 2019 Top 8 Qualifier
  • 17,987 posts
  • LocationSnow

Posted 17 December 2015 - 05:22 PM

View PostGas Guzzler, on 16 December 2015 - 05:14 PM, said:


Yeah, I have warmed up to the ~3 second Dorito delay mechanic they mentioned instead of the indefinite dorito deprivation that it currently has.

It is still useful at that point, but not such a hard counter.


It wasn't a dorito delay, it was a Paperdoll info delay.

Instant Dorito at max sensor range, because they removed the 'targetingfactor' penalty, which cuts range by whatever percentage.

Live is 25%, PTS1-3 was 100%, or not affected.


Ideally, it would be set to 50%ish.

#119 Gas Guzzler

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Big Daddy
  • Big Daddy
  • 14,274 posts
  • LocationCalifornia Central Coast

Posted 17 December 2015 - 05:30 PM

View PostWales Grey, on 17 December 2015 - 03:13 PM, said:


"Competitive" is not a word that belongs in the same sentence as "MWO", unless directly preceded by a negation such as "not". Or you're describing the general game being player versus player; I'm assuming you're using it in the sense of "DOTA/CS/Smash/MLG is competitive".


No idea what you are talking about. Competitive matches are a thing in MWO.

The point is, this mech is not going to be the best competitive option to take, therefore it is not P2W. Its incredibly simple.

#120 Koniving

    Welcoming Committee

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Guide
  • The Guide
  • 23,384 posts

Posted 17 December 2015 - 05:37 PM

View PostProsperity Park, on 16 December 2015 - 03:56 PM, said:

I don't like how we have more Mechs coming out where the Hero is the only version that has ECM. I think many of us will agree that ECM is still worth more than 1.5 tons, so giving only the Heo Mech ECM without assigning any significant drawbacks makes me unsettled.

I think that Mech chassis that offer an ECM Hero should also offer a ECM Standard Variant. So, instead of just the Archer Tempest getting ECM, one of the standard variants should also get ECM.

Do others feel this way, too?


I think at the very least each weight should have one ECM that isn't a paywall. Even if not in the same chassis as a paywall hero.
Or better, remove the ECM hardpoint, remove the "Cloaking device," have ECM jam within 180 meters of itself and only that space (not just enemy launchers but any missiles within 180 meters that have Artemis -- jam the Artemis quirks.). And allow anyone to use it.

If someone has Artemis, great! You have a useful defense. What's that, no one has Artemis? You wasted 1.5 tons of equipment. We won't be seeing a craze of ECM.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users