data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3ae9/b3ae9cf8cfed3e06df6984fcf2a08c460eab065d" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d8b54/d8b54e7a47cf52481bc45d3566c7b0ade78ceb21" alt=""
Please Stop Telling Me How To Build.
#381
Posted 15 February 2016 - 02:34 AM
#384
Posted 15 February 2016 - 03:27 AM
Yeah, let me just sit in front of the entire enemy team to hold a lock. While I am being pummeled by the entire enemy team, the LRM guy can unload his 'awesome payload' and gently caress one of the enemy mechs.
Let me spend 40k on a uav that gets shot down after 5 seconds so some dude in the back that isn't going to take damage until the rest of the team is dead and then get run over 12v1.
And LRMs are especially bad in CW.
Grim Portico - This map is almost nothing but LRM cover
Emerald Taiga - Probably second best map for LRMs but still plenty of cover
Hellebore Springs - Inside and around the gates there's plenty of cover
Sulfurous Rift - Again plenty of cover everywhere
Vitric Forge - Cover everywhere inside, outside doesn't matter because you're already winning/losing if the fight moves to the outside
Boreal Vault - This map is potential for LRMs but only if multiple people are using them
Any potential LRMs might have is pretty much totally negated by enemy ecm or massed AMS. I've only seen them do well one time and that was on boreal with multiple dedicated narc mechs and zero ecm/ams on the enemy team.
A team could always use another mech on the line rather than one in the rear. Being able to put pinpoint damage where it's needed without a delay, WHILE being on the front and taking a bit of damage for the rest of the team. Pushes get stalled because there's nobody else to take the lead that doesn't have exposed internals....if only the LRM guys had brought real mechs instead......
#385
Posted 15 February 2016 - 03:49 AM
#387
Posted 15 February 2016 - 04:25 AM
Tasker, on 14 February 2016 - 09:33 AM, said:
*sigh* occasionally you say things I just have to agree with...still recovering from last time!
Dear coordinator!
#388
Posted 15 February 2016 - 04:31 AM
#389
Posted 15 February 2016 - 04:33 AM
Jon Gotham, on 15 February 2016 - 04:25 AM, said:
Dear coordinator!
It doesn't matter what the message is, if the delivery is jerkish or abusive people aren't going to listen. That's what the pushback is about, not that people don't want to play better. Note that the OP took advice from someone who was civil about it.
#390
Posted 15 February 2016 - 04:59 AM
lordtzar, on 15 February 2016 - 03:27 AM, said:
Yeah, let me just sit in front of the entire enemy team to hold a lock. While I am being pummeled by the entire enemy team, the LRM guy can unload his 'awesome payload' and gently caress one of the enemy mechs.
Let me spend 40k on a uav that gets shot down after 5 seconds so some dude in the back that isn't going to take damage until the rest of the team is dead and then get run over 12v1.
And LRMs are especially bad in CW.
Grim Portico - This map is almost nothing but LRM cover
Emerald Taiga - Probably second best map for LRMs but still plenty of cover
Hellebore Springs - Inside and around the gates there's plenty of cover
Sulfurous Rift - Again plenty of cover everywhere
Vitric Forge - Cover everywhere inside, outside doesn't matter because you're already winning/losing if the fight moves to the outside
Boreal Vault - This map is potential for LRMs but only if multiple people are using them
Any potential LRMs might have is pretty much totally negated by enemy ecm or massed AMS. I've only seen them do well one time and that was on boreal with multiple dedicated narc mechs and zero ecm/ams on the enemy team.
A team could always use another mech on the line rather than one in the rear. Being able to put pinpoint damage where it's needed without a delay, WHILE being on the front and taking a bit of damage for the rest of the team. Pushes get stalled because there's nobody else to take the lead that doesn't have exposed internals....if only the LRM guys had brought real mechs instead......
Hell, I'm doing it all wrong on those maps. And, I don't know was that the intented design or just a coinsidence but the reasonable cover on the CW maps (except Vitric Forge) is available only at places from where you cannot participate actively or are open to direct fire. So spooking people into hiding is a valid way to assist your team without the risk of shooting your temmates into the backs.
Over that, can anybody of those LRMs-are-a-liability guys explain me why 'soaking damage is The Purpose of an assult mech'? I was under impression that the goal is to damage the opponent and keep you mech as intact as possible? no deliberate 'shoot me, I'm pushing' or any other form of dealing damage only when receiving it?
And how to assist your teammates puishing the bottleneck from second row/middle row/kissing row/...row/back row (happens when only a mech or two can go through that narrow passage)?
#391
Posted 15 February 2016 - 05:06 AM
This is the internet. You can do pretty much whatever you want, but you also have to expect and accept that everyone else can too.
You run sub-par builds in a game that many view as a competitive team game, you have to accept that you will get crap for it. You aren't going to get people to not point out something they see as stupid, any more than them pointing out your mistakes is going to make you change what you're doing.
Basically, the community as a whole has just as much right to dislike your builds and you for using them as you have to resist getting better or helping your team more.
This entire thread was just here to make one person feel better about their own actions, and is ultimately just as pointless as the advice people were giving the OP in game. Players aren't going to suddenly stop calling out other players for bad builds, and lower-end players aren't going to suddenly gain a new attitude about the game and decide to get better.
If he's having fun, he's gonna keep on doing his thing, whether it works well or makes anyone else happy or not. At the same time, he has to accept that there will always be someone pointing out how poor his build is. Get over it. This is the internet. Go play in the sandbox if you want your hand held and everyone to tell you it's all gonna be ok in the end. That applies to both sides of the argument.
#392
Posted 15 February 2016 - 05:19 AM
Kodyn, on 15 February 2016 - 05:06 AM, said:
Lol. How can you even think about calling this game "competitive team game", when balance is almost nonexistent in it?
#393
Posted 15 February 2016 - 05:19 AM
Edited by Malachy Karrde, 15 February 2016 - 05:20 AM.
#394
Posted 15 February 2016 - 05:22 AM
You're what this, and many other online games need more of. Looking forward to seeing you on the battlefield, on either side. o>
#395
Posted 15 February 2016 - 05:23 AM
MrMadguy, on 15 February 2016 - 05:19 AM, said:
See, I didn't actually call it that, if you read my post, I said "many view it as..".
As I said, it's the internet, everyone has every right to disagree with each other, so both sides of this argument will never get anywhere. But this thread will surely continue with people posting on both sides, thinking that their way of thinking is the only right way.
I personally think the OP's build is bad, but I also am not one to call out people in matches for their builds. I know better. He has just as much right to run his stuff as I do mine. Everyone needs to get over themselves.
#396
Posted 15 February 2016 - 05:25 AM
#397
Posted 15 February 2016 - 05:28 AM
Samial, on 15 February 2016 - 05:25 AM, said:
+1. Recently I've turned all chats off. There is nothing important, other players can say to me in pug queue. There is nothing important, I can tell them.
#398
Posted 15 February 2016 - 05:31 AM
Until I fielded it on Tukkayid 2 right besides their brawlers and had the same damage as them
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/74864/74864d4780045ab41266e7e36d8993b9dcfe8c5d" alt=":P"
Eh, Johnnay ... as long as YOU don´t hang back with that fattie like so many others do and ACTUALLY TANK, nothing can be said against that loadout if it works for you .
Just don´t hang back with your Atlants or you´ll earn the ire of everybody, me included, since Atlants were made to push
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/39757/397576fdbc60a7c8c747377b651bd0fb99421965" alt=";)"
#399
Posted 15 February 2016 - 05:45 AM
King Alen, on 14 February 2016 - 08:16 AM, said:
If your "play style" doesnt fit the mech you are in and you run a bad build, the issue is YOU and not the people telling you that the build sucks.
Find a mech to fits your play style, do not try to make a mech fit your play style. I know I shouldnt use and will never own a 100t mech. It doesnt fit how I play MWO.
MrMadguy, on 15 February 2016 - 05:28 AM, said:
****** serious?? So when someone says, "UAV in d4", you're the ******* that walks underneath it??
Edited by mogs01gt, 15 February 2016 - 06:11 AM.
#400
Posted 15 February 2016 - 06:05 AM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users