704 replies to this topic

[Bishop Steiner]

Metus regem, on 02 July 2016 - 11:21 AM, said:

You have no idea....

Also I can't support the Crusader cause in the slightest....

but it's a wonderful cause!

[Metus regem]

Bishop Steiner, on 02 July 2016 - 07:02 PM, said:

but it's a wonderful cause!

Crusaders no, Armoured Valkyrie YES!

[CK16]

Bishop Steiner, on 02 July 2016 - 07:02 PM, said:

but it's a wonderful cause!

HE IS A MONSTER! D:

Edited by CK16, 02 July 2016 - 07:05 PM.

[Metus regem]

TheArisen, on 02 July 2016 - 06:55 PM, said:

But the Ghost Bears become the biggest Warden clan after merging with the FRR.

Clan Ghost Bear had a 50/50 split, with no animosity between the two factions, they change declaration with the changing of a Khan.

[Bishop Steiner]

CK16, on 02 July 2016 - 07:05 PM, said:

HE IS A MONSTER! D:

a beautiful monster.

3025 era, Crusader-L is a favorite.

[Dr Mlem]

Bishop Steiner, on 02 July 2016 - 07:02 PM, said:

but it's a wonderful cause!

That is a pretty awesome mech. Supported

They still have so many awesome mechs to add in!

Edited by Lazy Badger, 02 July 2016 - 07:22 PM.

[Strum Wealh]

CK16, on 02 July 2016 - 07:05 PM, said:

HE IS A MONSTER! D:

No, no... THIS is a Monster!

Edited by Strum Wealh, 02 July 2016 - 07:24 PM.

[Metus regem]

Strum Wealh, on 02 July 2016 - 07:23 PM, said:

No, no... THIS is a THE
Monster!

FTFY

[Bishop Steiner]

Metus regem, on 02 July 2016 - 07:28 PM, said:

FTFY

No, Strum was right... they built more than 1, so it is "a" Monster, not "the" Monster.

[CK16]

Metus regem, on 02 July 2016 - 07:07 PM, said:

Clan Ghost Bear had a 50/50 split, with no animosity between the two factions, they change declaration with the changing of a Khan.

You question my Warden-ness?

Spoiler

So I am having a discussion on the official Battletech forums on this as well, so far same kinda split, though one person who is in charge of the MUL is not taking my bait for trying to get Ghost Bears on the MUL xD

http://bg.battletech...p?topic=51767.0

[Metus regem]

Bishop Steiner, on 02 July 2016 - 07:30 PM, said:

No, Strum was right... they built more than 1, so it is "a" Monster, not "the" Monster.

True, but I'm not sure that's the missile launcher armed arms prototype or the production model with laser cannons in the arms...

[Bishop Steiner]

Metus regem, on 02 July 2016 - 07:33 PM, said:

True, but I'm not sure that's the missile launcher armed arms prototype or the production model with laser cannons in the arms...

Using the old first ed palladium sourcebooks?

The actual correct info was missiles in the arms, not the P Cannons Palladium assigned them (corrected in the current edition Robotech RPG)

(was kinda bummed by that, as having those P? Cannon gave it a lot more defensibility in the old game...... new version? Anything gets close, it dies......)

Edited by Bishop Steiner, 02 July 2016 - 07:44 PM.

[Metus regem]

CK16, on 02 July 2016 - 07:31 PM, said:

You question my Warden-ness?

Spoiler

So I am having a discussion on the official Battletech forums on this as well, so far same kinda split, though one person who is in charge of the MUL is not taking my bait for trying to get Ghost Bears on the MUL xD

http://bg.battletech...p?topic=51767.0

Now where did I challenge your faction with in the two camps? I just call myself a true Warden, and refused to fight the IS, for a cause I do not believe in.

Bishop Steiner, on 02 July 2016 - 07:42 PM, said:

Using the old first ed palladium sourcebooks?

The actual correct info was missiles in the arms, not the P Cannons Palladium assigned them (corrected in the current edition Robotech RPG)

(was kinda bummed by that, as having those P? Cannon gave it a lot more defensibility in the old game...... new version? Anything gets close, it dies......)

I like my first ed books, tactical battle pods go pop so easy...


Edit:

CK, I'm flattered that you put my proposed hero up there.

Edited by Metus regem, 02 July 2016 - 08:11 PM.

[CK16]

Metus regem, on 02 July 2016 - 07:56 PM, said:

CK, I'm flattered that you put my proposed hero up there.

I was a very good idea, hopefully PGI takes it some way, they might not be able to fully take it 100% as you laid out since they might fear legal issues but I hope they take the idea up!

[ArmandTulsen]

We're not there yet in the timeline.

/nth time

[CK16]

ArmandTulsen, on 02 July 2016 - 09:28 PM, said:

We're not there yet in the timeline.

/nth time

It is closer then you and many would think "months" not years bud

[ArmandTulsen]

CK16, on 02 July 2016 - 09:52 PM, said:

It is closer then you and many would think "months" not years bud

Really... So we play two full years from 3050-3052 in real-time, then we magically jump nine years in a few months?

What?

[Snowbluff]

ArmandTulsen, on 02 July 2016 - 11:35 PM, said:

Really... So we play two full years from 3050-3052 in real-time, then we magically jump nine years in a few months?

What?

Apparently that's what Russ. Basically, it sounds like they're done with just doing mechs that are in timeline, so they can toss out the shiny new models.

[Hit the Deck]

ArmandTulsen, on 02 July 2016 - 11:35 PM, said:

Really... So we play two full years from 3050-3052 in real-time, then we magically jump nine years in a few months?

What?

Snowbluff, on 02 July 2016 - 11:41 PM, said:

Apparently that's what Russ. Basically, it sounds like they're done with just doing mechs that are in timeline, so they can toss out the shiny new models.

Yeah, and to introduce new weapons and equipment.

[Snowbluff]

Hit the Deck, on 02 July 2016 - 11:52 PM, said:

Yeah, and to introduce new weapons and equipment.

Are they doing that? I honestly don't know.