Widowmaker1981, on 04 March 2016 - 08:56 AM, said:
You really think an 80 kph, jumping 80 tonner with 4x high mounted UAC5s would be anything other than awesome sauce? really?
It won't be 80kph with 4 UAC5s, and I do like the idea of the variant, but I would prefer something that isn't restricted to just that build to be useful.
Widowmaker1981, on 04 March 2016 - 08:56 AM, said:
Stone Rhino does nothing the Kodiak doesnt do better due to geometry, because the KDK-3 got 4B. Id buy it instantly regardless, its my favourite mech in terms of looks bar nothing, but im under no illusions. the Kodiak-3 will be much better
It will have more balanced hardpoints than the Kodiak (like the 10E variant....) and a bit more variety (even some missiles for those missile boaters). That said it may be hard to beat the Kodiak, and that said, I'd almost prefer the Marauder IIC now.
Widowmaker1981, on 04 March 2016 - 08:56 AM, said:
We DONT especially need another good 55 tonner, cos we have the Scrow.
Or we could get more variety by having something that is able to do things the SCrow can't, and do them really well. Also I still want the Viper for the 40 ton slot but wouldn't mind the Griffin IIC.
Widowmaker1981, on 04 March 2016 - 08:56 AM, said:
Because the RFL with a 255 is the same speed as the Gyr (close enough)
The difference there is the Night Gyr has the better armor and firepower to make up for it. That and the hat worries me, its the same reason I really don't want the Glass Spider (and I <3 that mech). Let's be honest though, the Black Python is still the better choice since it could be a Timby with a better profile, and do most of the things the Night Gyr would do on top of that, all with ECM that neither have.
Edited by Quicksilver Kalasa, 04 March 2016 - 09:08 AM.