

Supernova Confirmed
#1
Posted 18 October 2016 - 02:12 PM
Thoughts?
#2
Posted 18 October 2016 - 02:13 PM
#3
Posted 18 October 2016 - 02:14 PM
#4
Posted 18 October 2016 - 02:17 PM
Totally should have played this off as me being psychic...

I just realized... this is going to have Highlander/Mauler slow mech syndrome.
Edited by Gas Guzzler, 18 October 2016 - 02:15 PM.
#5
Posted 18 October 2016 - 02:17 PM
Gas Guzzler, on 18 October 2016 - 02:17 PM, said:
Totally should have played this off as me being psychic...

I just realized... this is going to have Highlander/Mauler slow mech syndrome.
....
I can already see Supernova and Nova drop decks for faction play already...
#6
Posted 18 October 2016 - 02:19 PM
#7
Posted 18 October 2016 - 02:19 PM
#9
Posted 18 October 2016 - 02:20 PM
Ultimately really disappointed they are still trying to sell us worthless or homogeneous variants just to milk as much money even if it won't actually benefit the game.
Edited by Quicksilver Kalasa, 18 October 2016 - 02:21 PM.
#10
Posted 18 October 2016 - 02:20 PM
#12
Posted 18 October 2016 - 02:22 PM
Quicksilver Kalasa, on 18 October 2016 - 02:20 PM, said:
Yeah, its going to come with the Highlander/Mauler-esque engine cap of 325, it won't be able to compete with the MAD-IIC unless it has super ballistic hardpoints (four spreadout between at least 2 components), in which case it wouldn't be able to compete with the Kodiak.
I think the Kingfisher or Turkina would have been more interesting...

#15
Posted 18 October 2016 - 02:23 PM
Well, have fun with your energy boat, clanners. Hope none of you were in the mood for, you know... variety.
EDIT: Oh look, they made up one missile chassis. And then they made up two more laser boats.
Whee.
Edited by Bombast, 18 October 2016 - 02:25 PM.
#16
Posted 18 October 2016 - 02:23 PM
Quicksilver Kalasa, on 18 October 2016 - 02:20 PM, said:
Ultimately really disappointed they are still trying to sell us worthless or homogeneous variants just to milk as much money even if it won't actually benefit the game.
Naw Supernova is better.
#17
Posted 18 October 2016 - 02:24 PM
Marack Drock the Unicorn Wizard, on 18 October 2016 - 02:23 PM, said:
Hell no. Supernova is going to be too slow (63 kph with max engine). MAD-IIC will be better fo sho.
#18
Posted 18 October 2016 - 02:24 PM
Lorian Sunrider, on 18 October 2016 - 02:20 PM, said:
Here is a breakdown of the variants:
4 are energy only with 7-8 hardpoints in various locations
1 is half missile half energy with 4 of each (think HGN-IIC-A with an extra missile hardpoint and not awkward hardpoint locations)
1 (the hero) has 3 torso energy, 3 torso missiles, and a ballistic in each arm, making it better than the HGN-IIC-C, could've been better than the MAD-IIC hero if it didn't have the super low engine cap.
Edited by Quicksilver Kalasa, 18 October 2016 - 02:27 PM.
#19
Posted 18 October 2016 - 02:25 PM



9 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 9 guests, 0 anonymous users