

#221
Posted 22 February 2012 - 06:21 PM
I hate the commando. But that looks spectacular. Love the sensor array in the right eye and the cockpit in the left.
-Cheers
#222
Posted 22 February 2012 - 06:31 PM
#223
Posted 22 February 2012 - 06:36 PM

#224
Posted 22 February 2012 - 06:40 PM
#225
Posted 22 February 2012 - 07:30 PM


#226
Posted 22 February 2012 - 07:35 PM
#227
Posted 22 February 2012 - 07:41 PM
Aegis Kleais™, on 22 February 2012 - 04:37 PM, said:
I don't really think getting my ears checked is going to help with arguing on the internet...
Aegis Kleais™, on 22 February 2012 - 04:37 PM, said:
Are you concerned you'll mistake them for infantry?
Aegis Kleais™, on 22 February 2012 - 04:37 PM, said:
One isn't an inner sphere 'mech, one doesn't come into being until 3058... you're going to be waiting a while for those.
#228
Posted 22 February 2012 - 07:44 PM
#229
Posted 22 February 2012 - 07:54 PM
#230
Posted 22 February 2012 - 07:56 PM
Edited by Lord Trogus, 22 February 2012 - 07:57 PM.
#231
Posted 22 February 2012 - 07:58 PM
And GJ on the redesign. Another one with more "military machine flair" and a bit less, but not much less, "man in a suit" look.
#232
Posted 22 February 2012 - 08:23 PM
Aegis Kleais™, on 22 February 2012 - 07:47 PM, said:

I'm actually kind of waiting for you to offer something in the way of proof demonstrating that a Centurion and a Commando are indistinguishable from one another. There isn't a whole lot of room for "rebuttal" when we're dealing your opinion.
Aegis Kleais™, on 22 February 2012 - 07:47 PM, said:
I just thought it was an odd choice of wording, and it amused me. Was just poking fun, not trying to ruffle feathers.

Aegis Kleais™, on 22 February 2012 - 07:47 PM, said:
I was beginning to wonder.
^^^ And that's sarcasm there, too.
Well, mostly. I actually was beginning to wonder a bit, the way you were going on.
Aegis Kleais™, on 22 February 2012 - 07:47 PM, said:
Maybe you should have chosen your example more carefully? If you'd said "Ravens, Guillotines, Stalkers, Rifleman, etc." I'd have seen the point, since I'd reasonably expect those to be around at launch, but not the others.
Aegis Kleais™, on 22 February 2012 - 07:47 PM, said:
I like the Commando, I'd have been happy to see a Hussar or a Crab or a Guillotine or a Thunderbolt or a Stalker or a Thug or...
I just don't think the argument that the Commando and the Centurion "look the same" is credible. Both are somewhat humanoid, but both have unique and distinctive features. If they'd released a Wasp and a Stinger back-to-back, or a Panther and a Wolfhound back-to-back, I'd be disappointed along with you. Plus, the Catapult was just released as 'mech 5, and that's totally non-humanoid, among the relative few in the I.S. pre-Invasion that are totally non-humanoid in design.
#233
Posted 22 February 2012 - 08:28 PM
Excellent.
Oh, and in case some of you are still confused as to why FD added a "monocle" to the Commando's head, I point you to the US Army's Land Warrior program: http://en.wikipedia....ki/Land_warrior
Notice the OLED computer display attached to this guy's helmet:

Not saying that it's the exact reason why FD chose to design the head assembly that way, but there is precidence. There are also fictional examples of people using these type of advanced displays as far back as the original Aliens movie (the Marines using the smart gun) and as late as Solid Snake in MGS4.
Edited by pursang, 22 February 2012 - 08:32 PM.
#234
Posted 22 February 2012 - 08:29 PM
#235
Posted 22 February 2012 - 08:47 PM
One of my favorite mechs ever!
Great job FD, its looks amazing! LOVE the monocacle...I'm certain it will make for many lolz

So far...this is my ride.
#237
Posted 22 February 2012 - 09:33 PM
Nik Van Rhijn, on 22 February 2012 - 11:57 AM, said:
Against most lights, 4 tons of armor is plenty. If you're facing something bigger, you've got more to worry about than ammo explosions.
#238
Posted 22 February 2012 - 09:36 PM
Aegis Kleais™, on 22 February 2012 - 07:47 PM, said:
LOL @ this, there was a post back there about smashing someone's teeth out through a cockpit. Wonder why anyone would think you were taking it personally? Go ahead and pick this apart too

#239
Posted 22 February 2012 - 09:39 PM
#240
Posted 22 February 2012 - 09:44 PM
Bull Frog, on 22 February 2012 - 09:39 PM, said:
I never used the SRM6 on that 'mech because I didn't want to waste the ammo. Got in to an Awesome and stayed with it after.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users