Jump to content

Quickdraw (Mech Of The Month -- June)


226 replies to this topic

#161 Damocles

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Hammer
  • The Hammer
  • 1,527 posts
  • LocationOakland, CA

Posted 06 June 2013 - 07:51 AM

3x LLaser
2x SSRM2
300 std engine
JJs.
80%~ armor

#162 Lucy Cameron

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 282 posts
  • LocationAtlanta, GA

Posted 06 June 2013 - 08:09 AM

Lasers, missiles, jump jets, and speed....where do I sign up? :)

#163 ManDaisy

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Elite Founder
  • Elite Founder
  • 3,272 posts
  • LocationKing Of Flower Beds

Posted 06 June 2013 - 09:03 AM

Interesting fact, its not hard to make a heat efficient 5 large laser quickdraw.

#164 Stone Profit

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Mercenary
  • Mercenary
  • 1,376 posts
  • LocationHouston, TX

Posted 06 June 2013 - 09:26 AM

View PostLowridah, on 06 June 2013 - 03:10 AM, said:


Oh Im sorry, I forgot I needed to get your approval for my opinion. How about you take your Ego out of your *** and ditch the arrogance? May be a little difficult to do im sure ..

Hey Pot, call the kettle black much?

#165 KeefCheef

    Member

  • PipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 42 posts
  • LocationThe Periphery

Posted 06 June 2013 - 09:40 AM

View PostDamocles, on 06 June 2013 - 07:51 AM, said:

3x LLaser
2x SSRM2
300 std engine
JJs.
80%~ armor


Sounds a lot like a Trebuchet

#166 Deathlike

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Littlest Helper
  • Littlest Helper
  • 29,240 posts
  • Location#NOToTaterBalance #BadBalanceOverlordIsBad

Posted 06 June 2013 - 10:31 AM

View PostSgtMagor, on 06 June 2013 - 03:41 AM, said:

must have variant with ECM, Targeting computer, Arty IV QKD-5Mr ;) , this mech is supposed to jump as far as a light mech, so we have a Hunter/Killer with the mobility of a light.


No targeting comp available, and no ER med yet. So.. no ECM variant until then (at least it won't be available on its debut).

Edited by Deathlike, 06 June 2013 - 10:32 AM.


#167 StonedVet

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 593 posts

Posted 06 June 2013 - 10:53 AM

View PostBishop Steiner, on 06 June 2013 - 06:19 AM, said:

lol, yup the irony of your statement has obviously eluded you, perhaps because your head is so far up your own? Put your opinions up as all encompassing announcements of somethings worth, expect to get called on it. Get some thicker skin, or stay off public forums.


I like the fact that now it looks like when you DO "come at him" he won't snap at the ankles!

so you take my post which states my opinion of hey none of them excite me and turn it into some arrogant higher then the rest of us reply on your part. Get off the high horse of yours and join the rest of us in the "regular ordinary people" column.

#168 Damocles

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Hammer
  • The Hammer
  • 1,527 posts
  • LocationOakland, CA

Posted 06 June 2013 - 08:58 PM

View PostKeefCheef, on 06 June 2013 - 09:40 AM, said:


Sounds a lot like a Trebuchet

Sure does (also; Ostroc), but one that can take a hit.

Same goes for pretty much any 60-tonner. Medium mech firepower(+) and speed, better durability.

Edited by Damocles, 06 June 2013 - 08:58 PM.


#169 Name140704

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,196 posts
  • LocationBehind You

Posted 08 June 2013 - 12:26 PM

View Postwirikidor, on 06 June 2013 - 06:02 AM, said:

Wow I can't believe how many people are basing their entire gaming happiness on a mech they haven't even owned yet (the Orion).

I had one in Mechwarrior 2 Mercs and used an Orion throughout mechwarrior 3's campaign. Also have two of the plastic ones that came with Citytech 2nd edition. I have an Orion II-C mini as well, but we don't need to count that I guess since the clans won't be out until (likely) Summer 2014(3051).

I have owned a bunch, where did you get your info from?

#170 N I K O L A I

    Member

  • PipPipPip
  • Knight Errant
  • Knight Errant
  • 84 posts

Posted 10 June 2013 - 01:37 AM

Can we buy or play with Dragon when Quickdraw comes out?

#171 Tennex

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The 1 Percent
  • The 1 Percent
  • 6,619 posts

Posted 10 June 2013 - 03:19 AM

well if they are going to introduce the blatantly supperior quickdraw. they need to increase the dragon's torso twist range

#172 TexAce

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The 1 Percent
  • The 1 Percent
  • 2,861 posts
  • LocationGermany

Posted 10 June 2013 - 04:55 AM

This thing looks fast and mean. The more I look at it the more I like it.
The elbow blades are cool, hopefully they are wide enough to be used as shields.

#173 SMDMadCow

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 1,055 posts
  • LocationDallas, TX

Posted 10 June 2013 - 06:26 AM

View PostTennex, on 10 June 2013 - 03:19 AM, said:

well if they are going to introduce the blatantly supperior quickdraw. they need to increase the dragon's torso twist range


What makes the Quickdraw "blatantly superior" to the Dragon? Surely not the JJs that everyone seems to be whining about. And the Dragon has ballistics where the Quickdraw wont. To me neither is superior, theyre just different.

#174 One Medic Army

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,985 posts
  • LocationBay Area, California

Posted 10 June 2013 - 10:10 AM

View PostSMDMadCow, on 10 June 2013 - 06:26 AM, said:

What makes the Quickdraw "blatantly superior" to the Dragon? Surely not the JJs that everyone seems to be whining about. And the Dragon has ballistics where the Quickdraw wont. To me neither is superior, theyre just different.

Jets.
More hardpoints.
Better hardpoint layout.
No gigantic nose w/ super-wide arms.

#175 scJazz

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,668 posts
  • LocationNew London, CT

Posted 10 June 2013 - 10:14 AM

Forgive me for asking an obvious question but...

How do we know the Hardpoint layout? I mean I can grab my TRO3025 and read it. But is there somewhere I've missed showing it for MWO?

#176 FupDup

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 26,888 posts
  • LocationThe Keeper of Memes

Posted 10 June 2013 - 10:23 AM

View PostscJazz, on 10 June 2013 - 10:14 AM, said:

Forgive me for asking an obvious question but...

How do we know the Hardpoint layout? I mean I can grab my TRO3025 and read it. But is there somewhere I've missed showing it for MWO?

Hardpoints are a concept invented by Microsoft when they made MW4 and continued by PGI for MWO. Hardpoints don't exist at all in canon.

Edited by FupDup, 10 June 2013 - 10:24 AM.


#177 SMDMadCow

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 1,055 posts
  • LocationDallas, TX

Posted 10 June 2013 - 10:26 AM

View PostOne Medic Army, on 10 June 2013 - 10:10 AM, said:

Jets.
More hardpoints.
Better hardpoint layout.
No gigantic nose w/ super-wide arms.


We dont know the hard points or layout, we can only guess.
Jets arent all that.
Smaller CT may mean bigger STs making xl engines a deathtrap.

#178 Lugh

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Widow Maker
  • The Widow Maker
  • 3,910 posts

Posted 10 June 2013 - 10:44 AM

View PostTheMightyWashburn, on 04 June 2013 - 09:35 AM, said:

Im excited about this because it looks like it can go fast enough, jump, and have the firepower to make it comparable to the dragon as a skirmisher. BUT WITHOUT THE ******** GIANT CT!

QQ I hate my dragon cause it dies faster than any other mech I own in any situation.

You're doing the dragon wrong then.

#179 One Medic Army

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,985 posts
  • LocationBay Area, California

Posted 10 June 2013 - 10:57 AM

View PostSMDMadCow, on 10 June 2013 - 10:26 AM, said:

We dont know the hard points or layout, we can only guess.
Jets arent all that.
Smaller CT may mean bigger STs making xl engines a deathtrap.

Actually, we do know the minimum hardpoints, and their locations, for the various possible variants.
4G (and 4H):
LA 1E
LT 1M (10)
CT 1M (4)
RT 2E
RA 1E

5A (and 5K)
LA 1E
LT 2E
CT 1M (4)
RT 2E
RA 1E

5M isn't likely due to it having a "one-shot" launcher, and it has the same hardpoints/locations as the 4G and 4H anyway.

#180 SMDMadCow

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 1,055 posts
  • LocationDallas, TX

Posted 10 June 2013 - 11:20 AM

View PostOne Medic Army, on 10 June 2013 - 10:57 AM, said:

Actually, we do know the minimum hardpoints, and their locations, for the various possible variants.
4G (and 4H):
LA 1E
LT 1M (10)
CT 1M (4)
RT 2E
RA 1E

5A (and 5K)
LA 1E
LT 2E
CT 1M (4)
RT 2E
RA 1E

5M isn't likely due to it having a "one-shot" launcher, and it has the same hardpoints/locations as the 4G and 4H anyway.


Yes, we have a canonical base to work from, but all i am seeing is that the Quickdraw will be a heat beast while the Dragon can use a ballistic to cool off. Again, neither better just different.





5 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 5 guests, 0 anonymous users