#15121
Posted 02 December 2016 - 02:33 PM
And since they are under heavy FLAK since April they better have started to prepare since May.
I admit I feel like baptism nd blakemas at the same time - only that I'm curious how they will present themselves
#15122
Posted 02 December 2016 - 03:49 PM
Karl Streiger, on 02 December 2016 - 02:33 PM, said:
And since they are under heavy FLAK since April they better have started to prepare since May.
I admit I feel like baptism nd blakemas at the same time - only that I'm curious how they will present themselves
I think they will announce Solaris and the optimist in me hopes that those machines running 1vs1 matches will already have some Solaris alpha.
Also, I really hope they will announce melee mechs. That's the only thing that will make MWO stand apart any MW title so far.
#15123
Posted 02 December 2016 - 04:52 PM
Odanan, on 02 December 2016 - 03:49 PM, said:
I highly doubt this one, although it's more of a technical limitation than PGI just not wanting to do it.
#15126
Posted 02 December 2016 - 08:43 PM
Gas Guzzler, on 02 December 2016 - 11:46 AM, said:
You mean.. they should have announced the Mad Cat Mk. II 5 years ago?
Actually 5 years ago if you look up my threads I asked for the removal of the 1:1 timeline and PVE. I would on occasion mention the Mad Cat MK II. I would ask make a post or a tweet about randomly and rarely.
After 4 years of buying mechs I really never gave a **** about and we fight Tykayad 2-3 times already I figured it was time for my support to pay off.
Instead a bunch of the forums ruined the chance asking for the Kodiak.
So no my actual big letdowns was when they backpedaled on groups above 4 (got banned for it)
Prioritizing crap laptops over making a cryengine game
...and the constant delay of what most of us really wanted mechwarrior 5.
Remember I only stirred the pot for the MK II since feb. Everything before that was actual pushes for features to save the game.
Edited by Imperius, 02 December 2016 - 08:45 PM.
#15127
Posted 02 December 2016 - 11:02 PM
Odanan, on 02 December 2016 - 05:05 PM, said:
Odanan, on 02 December 2016 - 05:05 PM, said:
It seems like hatchets could just operate like a point-blank autocannon, dealing full damage at their point of impact.
Regardless of mechanics, this is the one plausible scenario for me in how they could introduce new equipment, sort of.
Leg-mounted SRMs on a Crusader? Quads? Sure, neither has been done before on a mech yet. IS Omnis? Kinda, but we've done omnis. Doesn't seem as special, but who knows what's worthy of Russ's specific word selection here.
We'll find out Soon.
#15128
Posted 03 December 2016 - 03:40 PM
#15129
Posted 03 December 2016 - 03:51 PM
Odanan, on 03 December 2016 - 03:40 PM, said:
No kidding. Even if (EDIT: and that's a BIG IF since we don't know and I didn't notice any noteworthy nods to melee in the "lore" for this monstrosity) they announce that Melee is coming with the thing they could have used something more iconic like the Axman (another 65 tonner) or the rather coveted Hatchetman.
The presentations are still 3 hours away and PGI is already bombing terribly.
Edited by Sereglach, 03 December 2016 - 03:52 PM.
#15130
Posted 03 December 2016 - 03:52 PM
#15131
Posted 03 December 2016 - 03:57 PM
Metus regem, on 03 December 2016 - 03:52 PM, said:
What abilities?
#15133
Posted 03 December 2016 - 04:10 PM
What a missed opportunity to announce melee mechs.
#15134
Posted 03 December 2016 - 04:15 PM
Metus regem, on 03 December 2016 - 04:10 PM, said:
Of course it will.
TBH, the mech LOOKS cool. But at this point, what makes us buy mech packs it's not the "something different" (which clearly this mech hasn't - Hatchetman on the other hand, would), but the nostalgia.
Creating n IS 65 tonner instead of releasing the Crusader (or even better, the Axman)? Who the hell is making those decisions?
#15137
Posted 03 December 2016 - 04:36 PM
Odanan, on 03 December 2016 - 04:15 PM, said:
TBH, the mech LOOKS cool. But at this point, what makes us buy mech packs it's not the "something different" (which clearly this mech hasn't - Hatchetman on the other hand, would), but the nostalgia.
Creating n IS 65 tonner instead of releasing the Crusader (or even better, the Axman)? Who the hell is making those decisions?
The real question is, what was Russ drinking when he thought this would go over well? He's the boss and would have final say.
#15138
Posted 03 December 2016 - 04:47 PM
but I feel bad for Alex here, he got his shot at his own mech design, did a good lore write up behind it. Its nto a common mech because I see it as a Solaris mech ect. Alex did a great job imo...I just hope they fix the salt meter cause I was very upset until I realized its a Solaris Mech which I can live with. They need to announce some good stuff later and hopefully another mech..that's real....
#15139
Posted 03 December 2016 - 05:21 PM
13 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 13 guests, 0 anonymous users