

#381
Posted 28 December 2015 - 01:18 AM
Let the jimmies rustle through them and embrace the power of nerdrage.
#382
Posted 28 December 2015 - 01:18 AM
Happens in game too lol....
#383
Posted 28 December 2015 - 01:18 AM
Kjudoon, on 28 December 2015 - 01:13 AM, said:
I think people should play what they want as well. Not play what they want as long as a team of dbags agrees that it's a "good" build, otherwise they ruin your game experience.
That's the difference

#384
Posted 28 December 2015 - 01:26 AM
Sandpit, on 28 December 2015 - 01:17 AM, said:
Trust me, it's pretty tame around here for the most part. I have no "enemies", I have people on my block and ignore list and I could honestly truly care no less than I do now about "running into them in game" lol
So they can....l shoot me? TK me? etc.? Then I just block and report them.
Other than that, I shoot them just as often as they shoot me so I ain't too skeered bout that one

When I say small, I mean 200 people that look.at the forums on a semi-regular basis small.

#385
Posted 28 December 2015 - 01:29 AM
Kjudoon, on 28 December 2015 - 01:13 AM, said:
Which is what, exactly? Leaving a LRM boat Atlas behind to take part in a NASCAR on Caustic? It resulted in a win. I see no reason to apologize for that. It worked for the team. I admit it didn't work out so well for that fella, but we can't make everyone happy in a match.
Sandpit, on 28 December 2015 - 01:18 AM, said:
That's the difference

I already said I'm not interested in dictacting your gameplay. But I don't like it when people dictate mine as well as a result.
Plenty of my builds aren't meta myself.
#386
Posted 28 December 2015 - 01:31 AM
So... Yeah. I actually had one match taped where i was the guy who got the kill on someone i had just that day got into it with me. I deleted it because of 2 reasons. I didnt want to gloat and it was just luck of the draw... Nothing more. I also will congratulate teammates of that variety when they do well beli3ve it or dont... If i have voip on.
#387
Posted 28 December 2015 - 01:33 AM
In unit play feel free to dictate my weight class my meta and command my actions...
#388
Posted 28 December 2015 - 01:33 AM
RestosIII, on 28 December 2015 - 01:26 AM, said:

Really you have about that here. We've seen a recent influx of activity since Steam but you have a few hundred (if that) or so regular forum visitors. Normally GD, CW, and Help sections are most active. If you want to see off-topic and calamity head to K Town. Lots of fun there lol
As far as off-topic? Trust me, this thread went off the rails about 15 pages back lol which is what happens with silly threads like this. Mostly, those of us that have been around for a while, try to help correct misinformation (such as the OP trying to imply hitting R is somehow "wrong" or "hard" or whatever), have a few discussions about some balancing ideas, and then make fun of the ones with no sense of humor and shame a few dbags and trolls along the way lol
Welcome to MWO forums and the community

#389
Posted 28 December 2015 - 01:33 AM
Simple as that. And i do run an lrm king crab from time to time with a top speed of 53. So what?
#390
Posted 28 December 2015 - 01:36 AM
Kjudoon, on 28 December 2015 - 01:31 AM, said:
So... Yeah. I actually had one match taped where i was the guy who got the kill on someone i had just that day got into it with me. I deleted it because of 2 reasons. I didnt want to gloat and it was just luck of the draw... Nothing more. I also will congratulate teammates of that variety when they do well beli3ve it or dont... If i have voip on.
My fanclub has tried all sorts of funny things. I even got all of Marik shamed once for letting me hang around lol I think Heffay and I were neck and neck until he went total troll lol Bishop does a fine job of it and he's got more patience with it than I do so he can continue being the white knight mascot

I'm too jaded to be a white knight anymore, but I applaud PGI when I think they've earned my praise, try to give suggestions to help improve the MWO experience, and try to help new players who want it. Other than that, I'm here for the pew pew pew and building a community I've invested a lot of time, money, and energy into

#391
Posted 28 December 2015 - 01:38 AM
Active lrm usage usually requires for you to stay with the group and close to the targets to get positive hits.
that statement implies that you are selfish and don't understand the game
#392
Posted 28 December 2015 - 01:40 AM
Edited by Kjudoon, 28 December 2015 - 01:42 AM.
#393
Posted 28 December 2015 - 01:43 AM
diablo595, on 28 December 2015 - 01:38 AM, said:
Active lrm usage usually requires for you to stay with the group and close to the targets to get positive hits.
that statement implies that you are selfish and don't understand the game
for the last time...
no
it doesn't
now that we've cleared that up can we stop saying it? We're all sorry some of you misinterpreted "asking for locks" to somehow magically mean we're going to sit in the back and not participate in the game other than lobbing random lrms at enemy mechs you so bravely charge into for the sole purpose of getting locks for lurms.
So now that it's finally all cleared up and the meaning has been clarified, can we move on? Next time you see someone "asking for locks" instead of assuming the above, how about just assume they're your teammate and the tactical data you send by hitting R is helpful and valuable instead of trying to concoct elaborate plots as to why your devious teammate dared to ask you to lock targets?
thanks

Edited by Sandpit, 28 December 2015 - 01:44 AM.
#394
Posted 28 December 2015 - 01:44 AM
Kjudoon, on 28 December 2015 - 01:33 AM, said:
Simple as that. And i do run an lrm king crab from time to time with a top speed of 53. So what?
Now this, I would apologize for. I did come off as a ***** in making my point. You say it rather better.
#395
Posted 28 December 2015 - 01:49 AM
Lol chew. Nothing taken personally here. I have had more experience being one of those censored things i suspect.
#396
Posted 28 December 2015 - 01:53 AM
Kraftwerkedup, on 26 December 2015 - 05:01 PM, said:
Some of us actually play the game, get kills, win games, you know, the stuff youre supposed to do.
If LRMs werent terribad, id be with you. Id help you get locks. But im not going to in any way encourage you being a bad player. THATS helping my team.
Trust me. I can carry your LRM Awesome. You just stand there and look pretty. I got this.
you are the bad player by not helping your team and promoting bad and ineffective play
#397
Posted 28 December 2015 - 02:26 AM
Extremist Pain, on 26 December 2015 - 03:31 PM, said:
I find it very amusing that a player that wants to hide behind his fellow teammembers and let them do all the risky work for him while contributing not _that_ much (because LRMs can be countered by numerous ways and his armor is missing on the frontline to share the damage) is calling other players out because of not team-friendly behaviour...
I totally agree that a well played LRM-boat can be a real asset. But usually these folks know what to do and do not ask for locks. You can find them near your frontline or flanking the enemy in fast Mechs, TAGging and NARCing for their own, picking the targets that are locked by others (as every player alwas should press "R" when targeting an enemy) and chooses to fire at the targest where his chance for reliable hits is greatest. Most of the time it is the mostly useless backstanders that ask for locks. It is especially funny when they are in a Clan-LRM-boat, as these are basically LRM _and_ Streak-boats due to no minimum range, therefore they are very capable on their own on the frontline.
#398
Posted 28 December 2015 - 03:45 AM
A: Provides another target for the enemy, potentially spreading damage for my team.
B: Allows me to control my engagements, and not rely on pug players to get my locks. Tag bonuses are nice as well.
C: Makes the game a lot more fun (for me) than staring at a mountain and lobbing missiles over it.
In conclusion, I think it is wishful thinking to build a mech around relying on others for locks in pug play, and will only lead to frustration.
Edited by Owen Miller, 28 December 2015 - 03:46 AM.
#399
Posted 28 December 2015 - 04:30 AM
Kjudoon, on 28 December 2015 - 01:49 AM, said:
Lol the world. Nothing taken personally here. I have had more experience being less grammarful i suspect.
FTFY
Serious, peek and poke clan builds complain about LRMs why? If being pro means hiding behind rocks for 10 minutes to get into the perfect position while the other side does the same count me out. This game needs more modes that force movement.
#400
Posted 28 December 2015 - 04:37 AM
Kjudoon, on 28 December 2015 - 01:49 AM, said:
Lol chew. Nothing taken personally here. I have had more experience being one of those censored things i suspect.
Sigh...I am not looking to pick a fight with you either. I do apologize if I came off as a *****, and for appearing to be inconsistent,
But I think you know roughly what I'm getting at, with Kjudoon's point above. Its pretty much the same.
If you want to play whatever mech you like, you should also accept that other people are going to play however they like too. It works both ways.
If you want to dictate my gameplay, I also want to be able to dictate your choice of mech. Or we can mutually just agree to disagree and go our own way as its a PUG.
That doesn't mean I will intentionally abandon you either just for fun, but neither will I hesistate to do so just for a higher score for myself, and I won't apologize for doing so.
No, I'm not ruining someone else's fun. It can also be argued that they are holding back mine, having to shepherd them around.
Competitive gameplay is different, but would such a build even be allowed in competitive?
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users